Functional status examination: A new instrument for assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury

被引:81
|
作者
Dikmen, S
Machamer, J
Miller, B
Doctor, J
Temkin, N
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Neurol Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
functional status; measurement development; outcome assessment; psychometric properties; psychosocial; quality of life; traumatic brain injury;
D O I
10.1089/08977150150502578
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The Functional Status Examination (FSE) is a new measure designed to evaluate change in activities of everyday life as a function of an event or illness, including traumatic brain injury. The measure covers physical, social, and psychological domains. The FSE is based on a structured interview and includes levels of functioning that accommodate the full spectrum of possible outcomes, from death through recovery to preinjury functioning. Based on 133 prospectively studied patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, the FSE has favorable psychometric properties including good test-retest reliability (r = 0.80) and close correspondence of assessments provided by the patient and their significant other (SO; r = 0.80). The FSE correlated significantly with each of three severity indices with closest relationships occurring between the FSE assessed by the SO and posttraumatic amnesia (r = 0.76). The FSE assessed by the SO was significantly (p < 0.05) more closely related to each severity index than the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) or Sickness Impact Profile and, for two of the three indices, than the SF-36. All measures showed significant change from 1 to 6 months after injury with the FSE showing the largest effect sizes. The FSE is significantly related to important constructs such as family burden, SO depression, and sacrifices the family makes, as well as overall indices of recovery and satisfaction with level of functioning. The latter relationships are significantly stronger than for the GOS. The FSE has demonstrated good reliability, validity, and sensitivity, and appears to be a promising instrument for monitoring recovery and assessing functional status in clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 140
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Functional outcome scales in traumatic brain injury: A comparison, of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (extended) and the Functional Status Examination
    Hudak, AM
    Caesar, RR
    Frol, AB
    Krueger, K
    Harper, CR
    Temkin, NR
    Dikmen, SS
    Carlile, M
    Madden, C
    Diaz-Arrastia, R
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2005, 22 (11) : 1319 - 1326
  • [2] Lessons from traumatic head injury for assessing functional status after brain tumour
    Wilson, J. T. Lindsay
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2012, 108 (02) : 239 - 246
  • [3] FUNCTIONAL STATUS EXAMINATION VERSUS GOSE AS OUTCOME MEASURES IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES: HOW DO THEY COMPARE
    Temkin, Nancy
    Dikmen, Sureyya
    Machamer, Joan
    Manley, Geoff
    Yuh, Esther
    Nelson, Lindsay
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2019, 36 (13) : A93 - A94
  • [4] Functional Status Examination versus Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended as Outcome Measures in Traumatic Brain Injuries: How Do They Compare?
    Dikmen, Sureyya
    Machamer, Joan
    Manley, Geoffrey T.
    Yuh, Esther L.
    Nelson, Lindsay D.
    Temkin, Nancy R.
    Adeoye, Opeolu
    Badjatia, Neeraj
    Boase, Kim
    Bodien, Yelena
    Bullock, M. Ross
    Chesnut, Randall
    Corrigan, John D.
    Crawford, Karen
    Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon
    Duhaime, Ann-Christine
    Ellenbogen, Richard
    Feeser, V. Ramana
    Ferguson, Adam
    Foreman, Brandon
    Gardner, Raquel
    Gaudette, Etienne
    Giacino, Joseph
    Goldman, Dana
    Gonzalez, Luis
    Gopinath, Shankar
    Gullapalli, Rao
    Hemphill, J. Claude
    Hotz, Gillian
    Jain, Sonia
    Korley, Frederick
    Kramer, Joel
    Kreitzer, Natalie
    Levin, Harvey
    Lindsell, Chris
    Madden, Christopher
    Martin, Alastair
    McAllister, Thomas
    McCrea, Michael
    Merchant, Randall
    Mukherjee, Pratik
    Noel, Florence
    Okonkwo, David
    Palacios, Eva
    Perl, Daniel
    Puccio, Ava
    Rabinowitz, Miri
    Robertson, Claudia
    Sander, Angelle
    Satris, Gabriella
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2019, 36 (16) : 2423 - 2429
  • [5] Lessons from traumatic head injury for assessing functional status after brain tumour
    J. T. Lindsay Wilson
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2012, 108 : 239 - 246
  • [6] Assessing Efficacy Of Neuroaid In Improving Functional Outcome In Intracranial Haemorrhage And Traumatic Brain Injury
    Kumar, R.
    Fadzil, F.
    Soon, B. H.
    Kamalanathan, P.
    Abdul, Jaffar
    Paramasvaran, S.
    Jeng, Charng
    Thananbalan, J.
    Abu Bakar, A.
    WORLD FEDERATION OF NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETIES (WFNS SYMPOSIA 2018), 2018, : 4 - 12
  • [7] Correlates of functional status 3-5 years after traumatic brain injury with CT abnormalities
    Temkin, NR
    Machamer, JE
    Dikmen, SS
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2003, 20 (03) : 229 - 241
  • [8] Assessing Quality of Life after Traumatic Brain Injury: Examination of the Short Form 36 Health Survey
    Guilfoyle, Mathew R.
    Seeley, Helen M.
    Corteen, Elizabeth
    Harkin, Christine
    Richards, Hugh
    Menon, David K.
    Hutchinson, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2010, 27 (12) : 2173 - 2181
  • [9] Personality and functional outcome following traumatic brain injury
    Rush, Beth K.
    Malec, James F.
    Brown, Allen W.
    Moessner, Anne M.
    REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 51 (03) : 257 - 264
  • [10] Functional Status Examination in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injuries
    Machamer, Joan
    Temkin, Nancy R.
    Manley, Geoffrey T.
    Dikmen, Sureyya
    JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2018, 35 (10) : 1132 - 1137