Effect of pulsed magnetic field therapy on pain reported by human volunteers in a laboratory model of acute pain

被引:25
作者
Fernandez, M. I.
Watson, P. J.
Rowbotham, D. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leicester Royal Infirm, Div Anaesthesia Crit Care & Pain Management, Leicester LE1 5WW, Leics, England
[2] Leicester Royal Infirm, Dept Hlth Sci, Leicester LE1 5WW, Leics, England
[3] Univ Hosp Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry CV2 2DX, W Midlands, England
关键词
analgesic techniques; pulsed electromagnetic field therapy; pain; acute; experimental;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aem129
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. Pulsed magnetic field therapy (PMFT) is a non-invasive, simple technique used extensively for the treatment of muscle pain. However, evidence to support its use from well-designed, clinical, or experimental studies is sparse. Methods. We have utilized an acute pain model to perform a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover-study on 10 male (18-40 yr) volunteers. Pain was elicited by infusion of hypertonic saline 5% into the brachioradialis muscle of the non-dominant arm on two occasions, at least 1 week apart. Subjects received active or sham PMFT for 30 min in a randomized order delivered by two identical, commercially available machines (PulsePack 6000, Quantum Techniks). The active machine delivered a M-wave magnetic pulse (1.25 Hz, 3 ms width, 600 Gauss); the sham device was deactivated and delivered no magnetic energy. Pain was assessed at 15-s intervals, and area under the visual analogue score (VAS) pain curve (AUCp) was calculated using the trapezoid method. Results. There were no significant differences in mean VAS pain scores between the two machines at any time. In addition, there were no significant differences with respect to mean (SEM) maximum pain score [sham 60 (8), active 63 (9) mm; P = 0.66, 95% CI-18 to 12 mm] or AUCp [sham 463 (50), active 499 (90); P = 0.64, 95% CI-201 to 129]. Conclusions. We conclude that, using the electromagnetic characteristics of the machine in this study, the PMFT had no effect on pain in our experimental model. More work is required to provide an evidence base in support of the use of this technique for pain.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 269
页数:4
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
ArendtNielsen L, 1997, MUSCLE NERVE, V20, P1311, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199710)20:10<1311::AID-MUS15>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-5
[3]   A possible involvement of β-endorphin, substance P, and serotonin in rat analgesia induced by extremely low frequency magnetic field [J].
Bao, Xiuqi ;
Shi, Yijun ;
Huo, Xiaolin ;
Song, Tho .
BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 2006, 27 (06) :467-472
[4]   BENEFICIAL-EFFECTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELDS [J].
BASSETT, CAL .
JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 1993, 51 (04) :387-393
[5]  
BASSETT CAL, 1989, CRIT REV BIOMED ENG, V17, P451
[6]   Static magnetic therapy does not decrease pain or opiold requirements: A randomized double-blind trial [J].
Cepeda, M. Soledad ;
Carr, Daniel B. ;
Sarquis, Tony ;
Miranda, Nelcy ;
Garcia, Ricardo J. ;
Zarate, Camilo .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 104 (02) :290-294
[7]   Extremely low frequency magnetic field exposure modulates the diurnal rhythm of the pain threshold in mice [J].
Choi, YM ;
Jeong, JH ;
Kim, JS ;
Lee, BC ;
Je, HD ;
Sohn, UD .
BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 2003, 24 (03) :206-210
[8]   Modification of osteoarthritis by pulsed electromagnetic field - a morphological study [J].
Ciombor, DM ;
Aaron, RK ;
Wang, S ;
Simon, B .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2003, 11 (06) :455-462
[9]   Effects of magnetic field exposure on open field behaviour and nociceptive responses in mice [J].
Del Seppia, C ;
Mezzasalma, L ;
Chloeris, E ;
Luschi, P ;
Ghione, S .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2003, 144 (1-2) :1-9
[10]   Magnet therapy - Extraordinary claims, but no proved benefits [J].
Finegold, L ;
Flamm, BL .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 332 (7532) :4-4