Distribution of cavity trees in midwestern old-growth and second-growth forests

被引:59
作者
Fan, ZF
Shifley, SR
Spetich, MA
Thompson, FR
Larsen, DR
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Nat Resources, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, USDA, N Cent Res Stn, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[3] US Forest Serv, USDA, So Res Stn, Hort Springs, AR 71902 USA
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE | 2003年 / 33卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1139/X03-068
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
We used classification and regression tree analysis to determine the primary variables associated with the occurrence of cavity trees and the hierarchical structure among those variables. We applied that information to develop logistic models predicting cavity tree probability as a function of diameter, species group, and decay class. Inventories of cavity abundance in old-growth hardwood forests in Missouri, Illinois, and Indiana found that 8-11 % of snags had at least one visible cavity (as visually detected from the ground; smallest opening greater than or equal to2 cm diameter), about twice the percentage for live trees. Five percent of live trees and snags had cavities on mature (greater than or equal to110 years) second-growth plots on timberland in Missouri. Because snags accounted for typically no more than 10% of standing trees on any of these sites, 80-85% of cavity trees are living trees. Within the subset of mature and old-growth forests, the presence of cavities was strongly related to tree diameter. Classification and regression tree models indicated that 30 cm diameter at breast height (DBH) was a threshold size useful in distinguishing cavity trees from noncavity trees in the old-growth sample. There were two diameter thresholds in the mature second-growth sample: 18 and 44 cm DBH. Cavity tree probability differed by species group and increased with increasing decay class.
引用
收藏
页码:1481 / 1494
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   EFFECTS OF FOREST STAND STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION ON RED-BREASTED NUTHATCHES AND BROWN CREEPERS [J].
ADAMS, EM ;
MORRISON, ML .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1993, 57 (03) :616-629
[2]  
ALLEN A W, 1990, Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, V7, P179
[3]   HABITAT SELECTION OF BREEDING BIRDS IN AN EAST TENNESSEE DECIDUOUS FOREST [J].
ANDERSON, SH ;
SHUGART, HH .
ECOLOGY, 1974, 55 (04) :828-837
[4]  
BRAWN J D, 1982, Wildlife Society Bulletin, V10, P271
[5]  
Breiman L., 1984, BIOMETRICS, DOI DOI 10.2307/2530946
[6]  
BROOKSHIRE BL, 1997, P MISS OZ FOR EC PRO
[7]  
CAREY AB, 1983, SNAG HABITAT MANAGEM, P167
[8]   SNAG CHARACTERISTICS AND DYNAMICS IN DOUGLAS-FIR FORESTS, WESTERN OREGON [J].
CLINE, SP ;
BERG, AB ;
WIGHT, HM .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1980, 44 (04) :773-786
[9]   WOODPECKER NESTING HABITAT IN CUT AND UNCUT WOODLANDS IN VIRGINIA [J].
CONNER, RN ;
HOOPER, RG ;
CRAWFORD, HS ;
MOSBY, HS .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1975, 39 (01) :144-150
[10]  
Dobbertin M, 1998, FOREST SCI, V44, P507