Surgical outcomes of laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in very elderly patients (older than 80 years): Time from symptom onset to surgery and changes in spinal cord signal intensity on MRI

被引:6
作者
Notani, Naoki [1 ]
Miyazaki, Masashi [1 ]
Kanezaki, Shozo [1 ]
Ishihara, Toshinobu [1 ]
Tsumura, Hiroshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Oita Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Oita, Japan
关键词
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Signal intensity loss; Very elderly; JOA score; Laminoplasty; Intramedullary hypointensity; EXPANSIVE LAMINOPLASTY; AGE; PREDICTION; FEATURES; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.06.019
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: We aimed to assess the surgical outcomes of laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) in very elderly patients (older than 80 years), focusing specifically on the time from symptom onset to surgery and on the loss in spinal cord signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive patients (61 males and 39 females) with CSM who underwent laminoplasty between 2006 and 2014. The patients were stratified based on the age at the time of surgery, with Group A consisting of 26 patients aged 80 years or older and Group B consisting of 74 patients younger than 80 years. The severity of myelopathy was assessed in terms of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Signal intensity loss on MRI was graded from I to III based on the size of the area with intensity changes (Grade I, one disk; Grade II, larger than one disk) and presence of intramedullary hypointensity on T1-weighted sagittal scans (Grade III). Surgical outcome, morbidities, and changes in spinal cord signal intensity on MRI were analyzed. Results: The time from symptom onset to surgery was 6.2 +/- 5.2 and 16.5 +/- 18.8 months in Groups A and B, respectively, with significantly shorter duration of symptoms in Group A (p < 0.001). Compared to Group B, Group A had lower mean JOA score preoperatively (8.8 +/- 1.9 vs. 10.1 +/- 1.7) and postoperatively (12.1 +/- 1.7 vs. 13.5 +/- 1.6), as well as lower mean JOA score recovery rate (40.7 +/- 12.5% vs. 51.0 15.4%) (p < 0.05 for all). However, there was no difference between the groups regarding achieved JOA score (Group A, 3.3 +/- 1.0; Group B, 3.4 +/- 1.0). Preoperatively, intramedullary signal intensity change was observed in 84.6% of patients in Group A (22/26; 3, 13, and 6 patients with Grade I, II, and III, respectively), and in (82.4%) of patients in Group B (61/74; 18, 38, and 5 patients with Grade I, II, and, respectively), with significantly higher incidence of Grade III pattern in Group A than in Group B. Conclusion: Compared to younger patients, very elderly patients had a shorter time from symptom onset to surgery but lower preoperative JOA score, indicating that the condition of very elderly patients is likely to deteriorate and become severe rapidly after the onset of myelopathy. However, it is very important to know these pathologies and optimize the timing of surgery, as laminoplasty for CSM can be beneficial even in very elderly patients.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 82
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Comparison of prognostic value of different MRI classifications of signal intensity change in cervical spondylotic myelopathy
    Avadhani, Ashwin
    Rajasekaran, S.
    Shetty, Ajoy P.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (06) : 475 - 485
  • [2] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [3] Intramedullary high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Prediction of prognosis with type of intensity
    Chen, CJ
    Lyu, RK
    Lee, ST
    Wong, YC
    Wang, LJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 (03) : 789 - 794
  • [4] Evaluation of prognostic factors and clinical outcome in elderly patients in whom expansive laminoplasty is performed for cervical myelopathy due to multisegmental spondylotic canal stenosis. A retrospective comparison with younger patients
    Handa, Y
    Kubota, T
    Ishii, H
    Sato, K
    Tsuchida, A
    Arai, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 96 (02) : 173 - 179
  • [5] Effects of surgical treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients ≥70 years of age:: A retrospective comparative study
    Hasegawa, K
    Homma, T
    Chiba, Y
    Hirano, T
    Watanabe, K
    Yamazaki, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2002, 15 (06): : 458 - 460
  • [6] Can Elderly Patients Recover Adequately After Laminoplasty? A Comparative Study of 520 Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    Machino, Masaaki
    Yukawa, Yasutsugu
    Hida, Tetsuro
    Ito, Keigo
    Nakashima, Hiroaki
    Kanbara, Shunsuke
    Morita, Daigo
    Kato, Fumihiko
    [J]. SPINE, 2012, 37 (08) : 667 - 671
  • [7] Outcomes of surgical treatment for cervical myelopathy in patients more than 75 years of age
    Matsuda, Y
    Shibata, T
    Oki, S
    Kawatani, Y
    Mashima, N
    Oishi, H
    [J]. SPINE, 1999, 24 (06) : 529 - 534
  • [8] Correlation between operative outcomes of cervical compression myelopathy and MRI of the spinal cord
    Morio, Y
    Teshima, R
    Nagashima, H
    Nawata, K
    Yamasaki, D
    Nanjo, Y
    [J]. SPINE, 2001, 26 (11) : 1238 - 1245
  • [9] Clinical features and surgical outcomes of cervical myelopathy in the elderly
    Nagashima, Hideki
    Morio, Yasuo
    Yamashita, Hideki
    Yamane, Koji
    Teshima, Ryota
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (444) : 140 - 145
  • [10] Clinical features and surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients aged 80 years or older: a multi-center retrospective study
    Nagashima, Hideki
    Dokai, Toshiyuki
    Hashiguchi, Hirokazu
    Ishii, Hiroyuki
    Kameyama, Yasuhiro
    Katae, Yuji
    Morio, Yasuo
    Morishita, Tsugutake
    Murata, Masaaki
    Nanjo, Yoshiro
    Takahashi, Toshiaki
    Tanida, Atsushi
    Tanishima, Shinji
    Yamane, Koji
    Teshima, Ryota
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (02) : 240 - 246