Three new models for preference voting and aggregation

被引:35
作者
Wang, Y. M. [1 ]
Chin, K. S.
Yang, J. B.
机构
[1] Fuzhou Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Fujian 350002, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] City Univ Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
preference voting; preference aggregation; data envelopment analysis (DEA); Borda-Kendall method;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602295
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Preference voting and aggregation require the determination of the weights associated with different ranking places. This paper proposes three new models to assess the weights. Two of them are linear programming ( LP) models which determine a common set of weights for all the candidates considered and the other is a nonlinear programming (NLP) model that determines the most favourable weights for each candidate. The proposed models are examined with two numerical examples and it is shown that the proposed models cannot only choose a winner, but also give a full ranking of all the candidates.
引用
收藏
页码:1389 / 1393
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Correction to: ‘Information and preference aggregation’ [J].
Donald E. Campbell ;
Jerry S. Kelly .
Social Choice and Welfare, 2005, 24 :395-396
[22]   From Social to Individuals: A Parsimonious Path of Multi-Level Models for Crowdsourced Preference Aggregation [J].
Xu, Qianqian ;
Xiong, Jiechao ;
Cao, Xiaochun ;
Huang, Qingming ;
Yao, Yuan .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 41 (04) :844-856
[23]   CRF Framework for Supervised Preference Aggregation [J].
Volkovs, Maksims N. ;
Zemel, Richard S. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (CIKM'13), 2013, :89-98
[24]   Preference aggregation under binary uncertainty [J].
Sprumont, Yves .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 78 :64-67
[25]   Characterizations of scoring methodsfor preference aggregation [J].
Pavel Yu. Chebotarev ;
Elena Shamis .
Annals of Operations Research, 1998, 80 (0) :299-332
[26]   Exploiting value system multiplicity and preference voting for robust ranking [J].
Oukil, Amar .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2020, 94
[27]   A new preference voting method for sustainable location planning using geographic information system and data envelopment analysis [J].
Izadikhah, Mohammad ;
Saen, Reza Farzipoor .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 137 :1347-1367
[28]   Ordinal measurement, preference aggregation and interlaboratory comparisons [J].
Muravyov, Sergey V. .
MEASUREMENT, 2013, 46 (08) :2927-2935
[29]   Incompleteness and incomparability in preference aggregation: Complexity results [J].
Pini, M. S. ;
Rossi, F. ;
Venable, K. B. ;
Walsh, T. .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 175 (7-8) :1272-1289
[30]   Preference Aggregation in the Generalised Unavailable Candidate Model [J].
Sebert, Arnaud Grivet ;
Maudet, Nicolas ;
Perny, Patrice ;
Viappiani, Paolo .
ALGORITHMIC DECISION THEORY, ADT 2021, 2021, 13023 :35-50