Three new models for preference voting and aggregation

被引:34
|
作者
Wang, Y. M. [1 ]
Chin, K. S.
Yang, J. B.
机构
[1] Fuzhou Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Fujian 350002, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] City Univ Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
preference voting; preference aggregation; data envelopment analysis (DEA); Borda-Kendall method;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602295
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Preference voting and aggregation require the determination of the weights associated with different ranking places. This paper proposes three new models to assess the weights. Two of them are linear programming ( LP) models which determine a common set of weights for all the candidates considered and the other is a nonlinear programming (NLP) model that determines the most favourable weights for each candidate. The proposed models are examined with two numerical examples and it is shown that the proposed models cannot only choose a winner, but also give a full ranking of all the candidates.
引用
收藏
页码:1389 / 1393
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Two effective total ranking models for preference voting and aggregation
    Hadi-Vencheh A.
    Mathematical Sciences, 2014, 8 (1)
  • [2] Simulations in Models of Preference Aggregation
    Diss, Mostapha
    Kamwa, Eric
    OECONOMIA-HISTORY METHODOLOGY PHILOSOPHY, 2020, 10 (02): : 279 - 308
  • [3] Iterative voting and multi-mode control in preference aggregation
    Loreggia, Andrea
    INTELLIGENZA ARTIFICIALE, 2014, 8 (01) : 39 - 51
  • [4] Designing preference voting
    Harfst, Philipp
    Bol, Damien
    Laslier, Jean-Francois
    ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2021, 69
  • [5] Multisensor accuracy enhancement on the base of interval voting in form of preference aggregation in WSN for ecological monitoring
    Muravyov, Sergey V.
    Khudonogova, Liudmila I.
    2015 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON ULTRA MODERN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND WORKSHOPS (ICUMT), 2015, : 293 - 297
  • [6] Complexity results for preference aggregation over (m)CP-nets: Pareto and majority voting
    Lukasiewicz, Thomas
    Malizia, Enrico
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 272 : 101 - 142
  • [7] Complexity results for preference aggregation over (m)CP-nets: Max and rank voting*
    Lukasiewicz, Thomas
    Malizia, Enrico
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 303
  • [8] New Learning Methods for Supervised and Unsupervised Preference Aggregation
    Volkovs, Maksims N.
    Zemel, Richard S.
    JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2014, 15 : 1135 - 1176
  • [9] The three-valued scale evaluative voting: A study of a new voting system
    Smaoui, Hatem
    Lepelley, Dominique
    REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE, 2013, 123 (06): : 827 - 850
  • [10] Information and preference aggregation
    Donald E. Campbell
    Jerry S. Kelly
    Social Choice and Welfare, 2000, 17 : 3 - 24