Ideational power and pathways to legitimation in the euro crisis

被引:23
作者
Carstensen, Martin B. [1 ,3 ]
Schmidt, Vivien A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Business & Polit, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[2] Boston Univ, Frederick S Pardee Sch Global Studies, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Org, Frederiksberg, Denmark
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Power; legitimacy; ideas; discourse; euro crisis; European Union; POLITICAL LEGITIMACY; DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT; INTEGRATION; GOVERNANCE; IDEAS; UNION; DEPOLITICISATION; CONSTRUCTIONS; MARKETS; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1080/09692290.2018.1512892
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
How have European Union institutional actors sought to build, defend or undermine the legitimacy of crisis management during the euro crisis? Scholars have tended to investigate the euro crisis from either a pragmatic and prescriptive perspective - asking which reforms are necessary to build legitimacy in the governance structure of the Eurozone - or an analytical perspective focused on the power wielding of actors useful for understanding what actors have done and why they have been influential or not. The paper argues that rather than bifurcating the issues of legitimacy and power politics, much may be gained by investigating the relationship between legitimacy and power. Specifically, the paper employs the concept of ideational power to analyze the strategies through which actors have sought to defend their claims to three constitutive dimensions of legitimacy - input, output and throughput legitimacy - and proposes a matrix of nine pathways to legitimation that played into processes of legitimacy battles in the Eurozone crisis.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 778
页数:26
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT POLITICS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1421 MPIFG
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, DEMOCRATIC POLITICS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, OXFORD HDB COMP REGI
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, GOVERNING EUROPE
[6]   Parliaments in the Euro Crisis: Can the Losers of Integration Still Fight Back? [J].
Auel, Katrin ;
Hoeing, Oliver .
JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2014, 52 (06) :1184-1193
[7]  
Ban C., GOVERNING LEGITIMACY
[8]  
Bastiaan van A, 2013, SOCIALIST REGISTER, V2014
[9]  
Beetham D., 2013, Tankebe and Liebling 2013, P19
[10]  
Beetham D., 1991, LEGITIMATION POWER