Evaluating Consulting Firms Using a Centroid Ranking Approach based Fuzzy MCDM Method

被引:0
作者
Chu, Ta-Chung [1 ]
机构
[1] So Taiwan Univ, Dept Management & Informat Technol, Taipei, Taiwan
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR FUZZY LOGIC AND TECHNOLOGY (EUSFLAT-2011) AND LFA-2011 | 2011年
关键词
Consulting firms; Fuzzy MCDM; Centroid; Ranking; DECISION-MAKING; REVISED METHOD; NUMBERS; SELECTION; AREA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and select consulting firms by suggesting a centroid ranking approach based fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) method, where ratings of alternatives versus qualitative criteria and the different importance weights among criteria are assessed in linguistic values represented by fuzzy numbers. Criteria are categorized to qualitative, benefit quantitative and cost quantitative ones. Membership functions of the final fuzzy evaluation values can be developed through a-cuts and interval arithmetic. The ranking approach of Euclidean distance based on centroid points is applied to determine the ranking order of all alternatives. Formulas for the ranking procedure can be clearly derived. Finally, a numerical example is used to demonstrate the computational process of the suggested model.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 118
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Ranking of fuzzy numbers by sign distance [J].
Abbasbandy, S. ;
Asady, B. .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2006, 176 (16) :2405-2416
[2]   A new approach for ranking of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers [J].
Abbasbandy, S. ;
Hajjari, T. .
COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 57 (03) :413-419
[3]  
Altman Wilf, 2008, Engineering & Technology, V3, P80, DOI 10.1049/et:20081220
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic
[6]   The revised method of ranking LR fuzzy number based on deviation degree [J].
Asady, B. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (07) :5056-5060
[7]   A REVIEW OF SOME METHODS FOR RANKING FUZZY SUBSETS [J].
BORTOLAN, G ;
DEGANI, R .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 15 (01) :1-19
[8]   Fuzzy multiple criteria decision making: Recent developments [J].
Carlsson, C ;
Fuller, R .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1996, 78 (02) :139-153
[9]   A multi-attribute comparison of Turkish quality consultants by fuzzy AHP [J].
Cebeci, Ufuk ;
Ruan, Da .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2007, 6 (01) :191-207
[10]   A fuzzy approach to select the location of the distribution center [J].
Chen, CT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2001, 118 (01) :65-73