Feasibility of radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for patients with high risk or locally advanced prostate cancer: Results of a phase I/II study

被引:63
作者
Konety, BR
Eastham, JA
Reuter, VE
Scardino, PT
Donat, SM
Dalbagni, G
Russo, P
Herr, HW
Schwartz, L
Kantoff, PW
Scher, H
Kelly, WK
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Genitourinary Oncol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[5] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Lank Ctr Genitourinary Oncol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
prostatectomy; drug therapy; prostatic neoplasms;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000108122.36893.5a
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We determined the feasibility of radical prostatectomy after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in locally advanced (stage T3 or greater) and/or high risk tumors (Gleason 8 to 10 and/or serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) greater than 20 ng/ml). Materials and Methods: Enrollment criteria included clinical stage T1 to 2 with any Gleason grade and PSA greater than 20 ng/ml, clinical stage T3 to 4 with any serum PSA or Gleason grade, or any clinical stage with biopsy Gleason grade of 8 to 10 and any serum PSA. All patients received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy during chemotherapy (4 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin and estramustine) followed by radical prostatectomy. Nerve sparing was decided on an individual basis and a nerve graft was offered to those who underwent unilateral or bilateral nerve resection. Perioperative morbidity, mortality and delayed complications were assessed. Results: A total of 36 patients were enrolled. After chemohormonal therapy clinical stage was less in 39% of patients and greater in 36%. Bilateral nerve sparing was performed in 3 patients and the remaining 33 underwent either unilateral or bilateral neurovascular bundle resection with nerve grafts performed in 17 (52%). Deep vein thrombosis (22%) was the most frequent complication of chemotherapy. Minor postoperative complications occurred in 6 patients. At a median followup of 29 months (range 5 to 51) after radical prostatectomy 32 (89%) were continent and 5 (15%) preoperatively potent men remained potent. The positive surgical margin rate was 22%. Of all subjects 45% remain free from biochemical recurrence. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy can be performed with low morbidity. Positive surgical margin rates are low. This approach yielded good local control of disease, however impact on tumor recurrence and survival is not known.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 713
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Phase II trial of neoadjuvant estramustine and etoposide plus radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer
    Clark, PE
    Peereboom, DM
    Dreicher, R
    Levin, HS
    Clark, SB
    Klein, EA
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2001, 57 (02) : 281 - 285
  • [2] DAMICO AV, 2000, GENITOURINARY ONCOLO, P681
  • [3] Randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing radical prostatectomy alone and neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal in the treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Goldenberg, SL
    Klotz, LH
    Srigley, J
    Jewett, MAS
    Mador, D
    Fradet, Y
    Barkin, J
    Chin, J
    Paquin, JM
    Bullock, MJ
    Sullivan, LD
    Gleave, ME
    McLoughlin, MG
    Prestage, K
    Kinahan, TJ
    Orovan, WL
    Whelan, JP
    Herschorn, S
    Keresteci, AG
    Robinette, M
    Bruce, A
    Stewart, DA
    Ruether, JD
    Ernst, DS
    Chetner, M
    Metcalfe, JB
    Elhilali, M
    Aprikian, AG
    Bertrand, PE
    Schick, E
    Tessier, J
    Halsall, AK
    Weckworth, PF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (03) : 873 - 877
  • [4] Drug therapy - Treatment of breast cancer
    Hortobagyi, GN
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (14) : 974 - 984
  • [5] A preoperative nomogram for disease recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Kattan, MW
    Eastham, JA
    Stapleton, AMF
    Wheeler, TM
    Scardino, PT
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (10): : 766 - 771
  • [6] Paclitaxel, estramustine phosphate, and carboplatin in patients with advanced prostate cancer
    Kelly, WK
    Curley, T
    Slovin, S
    Heller, G
    McCaffrey, J
    Bajorin, D
    Ciolino, A
    Regan, K
    Schwartz, M
    Kantoff, P
    George, D
    Oh, W
    Smith, M
    Kaufman, D
    Small, EJ
    Schwartz, L
    Larson, S
    Tong, W
    Scher, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (01) : 44 - 53
  • [7] KELLY WK, 2000, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V19, pA347
  • [8] Interposition of sural nerve restores function of cavernous nerves resected during radical prostatectomy
    Kim, ED
    Scardino, PT
    Hampel, O
    Mills, NL
    Wheeler, TM
    Nath, RK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (01) : 188 - 192
  • [9] EXTENDED EXPERIENCE WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR CLINICAL STAGE T3 PROSTATE-CANCER - OUTCOME AND CONTEMPORARY MORBIDITY
    LERNER, SE
    BLUTE, ML
    ZINCKE, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (04) : 1447 - 1452
  • [10] LERNER SE, 2000, GENITOURINARY ONCOLO, P789