Reduced fetal movements at term, low-risk pregnancies: is it associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes? Ten years of experience from a single tertiary center

被引:18
作者
Levy, Michal [1 ]
Kovo, Michal [1 ]
Barda, Giulia [1 ]
Gluck, Ohad [1 ]
Koren, Liron [1 ]
Bar, Jacob [1 ]
Weiner, Eran [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Edith Wolfson Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, POB 5, IL-58100 Holon, Israel
关键词
Low-risk pregnancies; Reduced fetal movements; Term; Delivery outcome; MATERNAL PERCEPTION; WOMEN; STILLBIRTH; OVERWEIGHT;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-020-05516-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective We aimed to assess the outcomes of low-risk pregnancies complicated by isolated reduced fetal movements (RFM) at term. Study design The study population were patients at term, with singleton, low-risk, pregnancies who presented to our obstetric-triage and delivered during the subsequent 2 weeks. The study group included patients with an isolated complaint of RFM (RFM group). The control group included patients without history of RFM (control group). The pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups. Severe and mild composites of adverse neonatal outcomes were defined. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify independent association with adverse neonatal outcomes. Results Among the 13,338 pregnant women, 2762 (20.7%) were included in the RFM group and 10,576 (79.3%) in the control group. The RFM group had higher rates of nulliparity (p < 0.001), and smoking (p < 0.001). At admission, the RFM group had higher rates of IUFD (p < 0.001). The RFM group had higher rates of Cesarean delivery due to non-reassuring fetal monitor (p < 0.001), and mild adverse neonatal outcomes (p = 0.001). RFM was associated with mild adverse outcome independent of background confounders (aOR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-2.6, p < 0.001). Conclusion Patients presented with isolated RFM at term had higher rates of IUFD at presentation and significant adverse outcomes at delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 993
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2009, OBSTET GYNECOL, V113, P451, DOI DOI 10.1097/AOG.0B013E31819930B0
[2]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Women's Health Care Physicians, 2013, Obstet Gynecol, V122, P706, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000433981.36184.4e
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Obstet Gynecol, V117, P192, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820a61f9
[4]   The outcomes of pregnancies with reduced fetal movements: A retrospective cohort study [J].
Bhatia, Meena ;
Mitsi, Vaia ;
Court, Lisa ;
Thampi, Premila ;
El-Nasharty, Mohamed ;
Hesham, Saeed ;
Randall, Wendy ;
Davies, Rachel ;
Impey, Lawrence .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (11) :1450-1454
[5]   Understanding the associations and significance of fetal movements in overweight or obese pregnant women: a systematic review [J].
Bradford, Billie F. ;
Thompson, John M. D. ;
Heazell, Alexander E. P. ;
Mccowan, Lesley M. E. ;
McKinlay, Chris J. D. .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 97 (01) :13-24
[6]  
Christensen F C, 2003, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, V14, P118, DOI 10.1080/jmf.14.2.118.122
[7]  
Dollberg S, 2005, ISRAEL MED ASSOC J, V7, P311
[8]   A kick from within - fetal movement counting and the cancelled progress in antenatal care [J].
Froen, JF .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (01) :13-24
[9]  
Gavin JR, 1999, DIABETES CARE, V22, pS5
[10]   Compliance with a fetal movement chart by high-risk obstetric patients in a Peruvian hospital [J].
Gomez, Luis M. ;
De la Vega, Guillermo ;
Padilla, Lourdes ;
Bautista, Fernando ;
Villar, Aurora .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2007, 24 (02) :89-93