Fiscal decentralization and public budgets for energy RD&D: A race to the bottom?

被引:42
作者
Kassouri, Yacouba [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] German Ctr Integrat Biodivers Res iDiv, Leipzig, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Dept Econ, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Nisantasi Univ, Fac Econ, Dept Econ Adm & Social Sci, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Fiscal decentralization; Public energy RD&D expenditures; Renewable energy; Energy efficiency; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; GOVERNMENT SIZE; CONSUMPTION; INNOVATION; COUNTRIES; DETERMINANTS; GOVERNANCE; INVESTMENT; INFERENCE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112761
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In previous studies, fiscal decentralization and public support to energy research development and demonstration (RD&D) have so far been investigated separately. This study combines these two strands of the literature on public policy by exploring the effects of fiscal decentralization (FID) on budget allocation for energy RD&D in renewable energy and energy efficiency fields (GERDD). With the panel of sixteen developed countries over 2000-2018, we explore the relationship between FID and GERDD by combining threshold models with quantile regression techniques. Our estimation strategy allows us to deal with asymmetric effects and potential endogeneity in the relationship between variables. Our analysis shows that the relationship between fiscal decentralization (revenue and expenditure decentralization) and GERDD is nonlinear and conditional on decentralization types. Specifically, the direction of expenditure decentralization changes from positive to negative depending on the degree of fiscal expenditure decentralization, while the adverse and significant impact of revenue decentralization is observed only in countries with greater revenue decentralization. The quantile analysis shows that countries with higher public support levels to energy RD&D tend to mitigate the race to the bottom phenomenon by minimizing the adverse effect of excessive fiscal decentralization.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   The rise of Europe: Atlantic trade, institutional change, and economic growth [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Johnson, S ;
Robinson, J .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 95 (03) :546-579
[2]   Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms [J].
Albrizio, Silvia ;
Kozluk, Tomasz ;
Zipperer, Vera .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 :209-226
[3]   The impact of energy technology innovations on cleaner energy supply and carbon footprints in Europe: A linear versus nonlinear approach [J].
Altintas, Halil ;
Kassouri, Yacouba .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 276
[4]   ANOTHER LOOK AT THE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF ERROR-COMPONENTS MODELS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOVER, O .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) :29-51
[5]   PANEL DATA MODELS WITH INTERACTIVE FIXED EFFECTS [J].
Bai, Jushan .
ECONOMETRICA, 2009, 77 (04) :1229-1279
[6]   Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in OECD Countries: Is There a Relationship? [J].
Baskaran, Thushyanthan ;
Feld, Lars P. .
PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW, 2013, 41 (04) :421-445
[7]   THE LAGRANGE MULTIPLIER TEST AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO MODEL-SPECIFICATION IN ECONOMETRICS [J].
BREUSCH, TS ;
PAGAN, AR .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1980, 47 (01) :239-253
[8]   Identifying and disentangling the impact of fiscal decentralization on economic growth [J].
Canavire-Bacarreza, Gustavo ;
Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge ;
Yedgenov, Bauyrzhan .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 127
[9]   The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition [J].
Carley, Sanya ;
Konisky, David M. .
NATURE ENERGY, 2020, 5 (08) :569-577
[10]  
Carrion-Flores C.E., 2005, ENV INNOVATION ENV P, DOI [10.22004/AG.ECON.19162, DOI 10.22004/AG.ECON.19162]