Assessment of eco-rehabilitation plans: Case study 'Richordi Berchet' palace

被引:21
作者
Ismaeel, Walaa S. E. [1 ]
Ali, Ahmed AbdelMonteleb M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] British Univ Egypt, Dept Architectural Engn, El Sherouk City, Egypt
[2] Qassim Univ, Dept Architecture, Coll Architecture & Planning, Qasim 52571, Saudi Arabia
[3] Assiut Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Assiut, Egypt
关键词
Embodied carbon; Embodied energy; LEED rating System; Life cycle assessment; Sustainable rehabilitation; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT; BUILDING REHABILITATION; ASSESSMENT LCA; WASTE MANAGEMENT; DEMOLITION WASTE; RATING SYSTEMS; END-POINTS; CONSTRUCTION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120857
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Setting eco-rehabilitation plans for cultural heritage buildings require robust guidelines and assessment mechanism to account for the reuse scenarios as well as the construction and demolition waste management plans (C&D-WMPs). This is problematic with the existence of numerous environmental assessment methods. Nevertheless, it is noted that the majority of building rehabilitation practices pay more concern towards the physical properties of materials rather than their environmental value. Hence, this study provides insights for using two different assessment methods in this regard; 'Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design' (LEED) and 'Life Cycle Assessment' (LCA). The study adopts a cross-comparative quantitative methodology using a practical case study analysis- 'Richordi Berchet' palace - the oldest historic LEED Gold certified building. It investigates the efficiency of LEED materials' credits to support sustainable building reuse and set C&D-WMPs. Noting that these credits operate in quite a simplistic and abstract manner based on materials' physical properties; weight, area or volume, hence, the LCA method is used to account for their environmental profile expressed in embodied carbon and embodied energy. This pinpoints cases where the use of LEED measurement criteria provides acceptable results and others where the use of LCA is necessary to yield reliable results-noting that their marginal percentage difference is estimated to be +/- 15%. This indicates the mutual benefit of integrating LCA to support LEED materials credits in such a way that achieves relevance and reliability of eco-building rehabilitation plans. This aims at bridging the gap between researchers and practitioners' best practices. It also provides insights for green building rating systems developers to consider the environmental value of sustainable rehabilitation guidelines and set reliable measurement and evaluation mechanism. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Adalberth Karin., 2001, INT J LOW ENERGY SUS, V2
  • [2] Building rehabilitation versus demolition and new construction: Economic and environmental assessment
    Alba-Rodriguez, Ma. Desiree
    Martinez-Rocamora, Alejandro
    Gonzalez-Vallejo, Patricia
    Ferreira-Sanchez, Antonio
    Marrero, Madelyn
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2017, 66 : 115 - 126
  • [3] Allacker K., 2013, ENV PROFILE BUILDING, P131
  • [4] Sustainability assessment of building rehabilitation actions in old urban centres
    Almeida, Claudia Peres
    Ramos, Ana Ferreira
    Mendes Silva, J.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2018, 36 : 378 - 385
  • [5] Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review
    Anand, Chirjiv Kaur
    Amor, Ben
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 : 408 - 416
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2006, 14040 EN ISO
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2010, ILCD Handbook: General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance, DOI DOI 10.2788/38479
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2008, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2017, LEED V4 BUILD DES CO
  • [10] [Anonymous], EU ACT PLAN CIRC EC