Comparative efficiency evaluations of four types of cooling tower drift eliminator, by numerical investigation

被引:46
作者
Zamora, B. [1 ]
Kaiser, A. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cartagena, Dpto Ingn Term & Fluidos, Cartagena 30202, Spain
关键词
Computation; Dispersion; Drop; Turbulence; Drift eliminator; Collection efficiency; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; FLOW; SIMULATION; DESIGN; MODEL; DEPOSITION; DROPLETS; IMPACT; CFD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ces.2010.12.023
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This work presents a comparative evaluation of the performance of four types of wave-plate drift eliminator commonly used in mechanical cooling towers, with similar morphology. The droplet collection efficiency and the coefficient of pressure drop are numerically calculated, for values of inlet velocity 1 < U-e < 5m/s and droplet diameter 2 < D-p < 50 mu m, with Reynolds number and inertial parameter roughly in the ranges 650 <= Re <= 8500 and 0.05 <= P-i <= 2.5, respectively. The numerical model has been validated through comparisons with numerical and experimental results taken from the literature, including additional configurations of horizontal wave-plate mist separators. The effects of considering the turbulence dispersion of droplets are studied, as well as the influence of the inertial parameter and the aspect ratio of the eliminator sample channel. Best results are obtained by using the SST k - omega turbulence model, with values of non-dimensional scaled distance to wall y(+) comprised in the range 0.2-0.5, including the turbulent dispersion of droplets. A global correlation for the collection efficiency is proposed, as a function of the inertial parameter and the removal geometric parameter, which is introduced in this work. Finally, it is developed a procedure focused on establishing the overall efficiency for each type of eliminator, based in a key power function. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1232 / 1245
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, US GUID
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, P 4 ANN M AER SOC LO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, TURBULENCE MODELING
[4]  
Azzopardi BJ, 2002, CHEM ENG SCI, V57, P3557
[5]   EFFECT OF DRIFT ELIMINATOR DESIGN ON COOLING-TOWER PERFORMANCE [J].
BECKER, BR ;
BURDICK, LF .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1992, 114 (04) :632-642
[6]  
Burkholz A., 1989, Droplet Separation
[7]   Dynamics and temperature of droplets impacting onto a heated wall [J].
Castanet, G. ;
Lienart, T. ;
Lemoine, F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2009, 52 (3-4) :670-679
[8]   COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CURRENT DESIGN EVAPORATIVE COOLING-TOWER DRIFT ELIMINATORS [J].
CHAN, J ;
GOLAY, MW .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1977, 11 (08) :775-781
[9]  
CHAN J, 1977, MITEL77004
[10]   DROPLET BEHAVIOR AND COLLECTION BY COUNTERFLOW COOLING-TOWER ELIMINATORS [J].
FOSTER, PM ;
WILLIAMS, MI ;
WINTER, RJ .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1974, 8 (04) :349-360