Prediction of Performance From PRB Coal Fired in Utility Boilers With Various Furnace and Firing System Arrangements

被引:5
作者
Chudnovsky, B. [2 ]
Talanker, A. [2 ]
Berman, Y. [1 ]
Saveliev, R. [1 ]
Perelman, M. [1 ]
Korytnyi, E. [1 ]
Davidson, B. [1 ]
Bar-Ziv, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Israel Elect Corp Ltd, IL-31000 Haifa, Israel
来源
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2010年 / 132卷 / 12期
关键词
fouling; fuel combustion; power system;
D O I
10.1115/1.4001298
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The present regulatory requirements enforce the modification of the firing modes of existing coal-fired utility boilers and the use of coals different from those originally designed for these boilers. The reduction in SO2 and NOx emissions was the primary motivation for these changes. Powder river basin (PRB) coals, classified as subbituminous ranked coals, can lower NOx and SOx emissions from power plants due to their high volatile content and low sulfur content, respectively. On the other hand, PRB coals have also high moisture content, low heating value, and low fusion temperature. Therefore when a power plant switches from the designed coal to a PRB coal, operational challenges were encountered. A major problem that can occur when using these coals is the severe slagging and excess fouling on the heat exchanger surfaces. Not only is there an insulating effect from deposit, but there is also a change in reflectivity of the surface. Excess furnace fouling and high reflectivity ash may cause reduction in heat transfer in the furnace, which results in higher furnace exit gas temperatures (FEGTs), especially with opposite wall burners and with a single backpass. Higher FEGTs usually result in higher stack gas temperature, increasing the reheater spray flow and therefore decreasing the boiler efficiency with a higher heat rate of the unit. A successful modification of an existing unit for firing of PRB coals requires the evaluation of the following parameters: (1) capacities or limitations of the furnace size, (2) the type and arrangement of the firing system, (3) heat transfer surface, (4) pulverizers, (5) sootblowers, (6) fans, and (7) airheaters. In the present study we used a comprehensive methodology to make this evaluation for three PRB coals to be potentially fired in a 575 MW tangential-fired boiler [DOI: 10.1115/1.4001298]
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, CHALL BURN PRB COAL
[2]  
Bar-Ziv E., 2005, LCC10005 BENG U NEG
[3]  
Bar-Ziv E., 2006, LCC10506 BENG U NEG
[4]  
Bar-Ziv E., 2007, LCC10507 BENG U NEG
[5]  
Bar-Ziv E., 2008, LCC10609 BENG U NEG
[6]  
Bar-Ziv E., 2005, LCC10105 BENG U NEG
[7]  
Bar-Ziv E., 2006, LCC10206 BENG U NEG
[8]  
Bar-Ziv E., 2006, LCC10306 BENG U NEG
[9]  
Benetech Inc., 60538 IL BEN INC
[10]  
Chudnovsky B., 2005, 2004P12115 ISR EL CO