Discontinuity, government and risk:: A response to Rigakos and Hadden

被引:10
作者
O'Malley, P [1 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
genealogy; government; governmentality; modernity; risk;
D O I
10.1177/1362480601005001005
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Rather than there being a single theory of risk and 'the risk society', there are two lines of thought proposing distinct conceptions of risk. These make quite different assumptions about risk's origins, and about any nexus between risk, class and capitalism. Consequently, many of Rigakos and Hadden's criticisms are wide of the mark. Likewise, this article challenges their assertions that a single genealogy of risk can be traced to origins in the 17th century, and that this is evidence of risks' class foundations and its place in a 'same olde modernity'. However, Rigakos and Hadden's emphasis on a need to examine the longer-term genealogy of risk is supported.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 92
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Beck Ulrich., 1992, Risk society: Towards a new modernity
[2]   TAKING THE STATE BACK OUT - ROSE AND MILLER ON POLITICAL-POWER [J].
CURTIS, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1995, 46 (04) :575-589
[3]  
DASTON L, 1986, CLASSICAL PROBABILIT
[4]  
DEAN M., 2010, GOVT POWER RULE MODE
[5]  
Ericson Richard., 1997, Policing the Risk Society
[6]  
Frankel B, 1997, NEW LEFT REV, P57
[7]  
Knight F. H., 1921, RISK UNCERTAINTY PRO
[8]   Uncertain subjects: risks, liberalism and contract [J].
O'Malley, P .
ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2000, 29 (04) :460-484
[9]  
O'Malley P, 1999, ECON SOC, V28, P138
[10]  
OMalley P, 1996, ECON SOC, V25, P137