Folding of the β-Barrel Membrane Protein OmpA into Nanodiscs

被引:4
作者
Asamoto, DeeAnn K. [1 ]
Kang, Guipeun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kim, Judy E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Chem & Biochem, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Neurosci, Dallas, TX USA
[3] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Biophys, Dallas, TX USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ULTRAVIOLET RESONANCE RAMAN; SYNTHETIC PEPTIDE ANALOGS; AMPHIPATHIC HELIX; LIPID-BILAYERS; COLI; INSERTION; VESICLES; SECONDARY; DETERGENT; KINETICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpj.2019.11.3381
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Nanodiscs (NDs) are an excellent alternative to small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) for studies of membrane protein structure, but it has not yet been shown that membrane proteins are able to spontaneously fold and insert into a solution of freely diffusing NDs. In this article, we present SDS-PAGE differential mobility studies combined with fluorescence, circular dichroism, and ultraviolet resonance Raman spectroscopy to confirm the spontaneous folding of outer membrane protein A (OmpA) into preformed NDs. Folded OmpA in NDs was incubated with Arg-C protease, resulting in the digestion of OmpA to membrane-protected fragments with an apparent molecular mass of similar to 26 kDa (major component) and similar to 24 kDa (minor component). The OmpA folding yields were greater than 88% in both NDs and SUVs. An OmpA adsorbed intermediate on NDs could be isolated at low temperature and induced to fold via an increase in temperature, analogous to the temperature-jump experiments on SUVs. The circular dichroism spectra of OmpA in NDs and SUVs were similar and indicated beta-barrel secondary structure. Further evidence of OmpA folding into NDs was provided by ultraviolet resonance Raman spectroscopy, which revealed the intense 785 cm(-1) structural marker for folded OmpA in NDs. The primary difference between folding in NDs and SUVs was the kinetics; the rate of folding was two- to threefold slower in NDs compared to in SUVs, and this decreased rate can tentatively be attributed to the properties of NDs. These data indicate that NDs may be an excellent alternative to SUVs for folding experiments and offer benefits of optical clarity, sample homogeneity, control of ND:protein ratios, and greater stability.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 414
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] ANANTHARAMAIAH GM, 1985, J BIOL CHEM, V260, P248
  • [2] Computational analysis of membrane proteins: the largest class of drug targets
    Arinaminpathy, Yalini
    Khurana, Ekta
    Engelman, Donald M.
    Gerstein, Mark B.
    [J]. DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2009, 14 (23-24) : 1130 - 1135
  • [3] In-Situ Observation of Membrane Protein Folding during Cell-Free Expression
    Baumann, Axel
    Kerruth, Silke
    Fitter, Joerg
    Bueldt, Georg
    Heberle, Joachim
    Schlesinger, Ramona
    Ataka, Kenichi
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (03):
  • [4] Self-assembly of discoidal phospholipid bilayer nanoparticles with membrane scaffold proteins
    Bayburt, TH
    Grinkova, YV
    Sligar, SG
    [J]. NANO LETTERS, 2002, 2 (08) : 853 - 856
  • [5] Membrane protein assembly into Nanodiscs
    Bayburt, Timothy H.
    Sligar, Stephen G.
    [J]. FEBS LETTERS, 2010, 584 (09) : 1721 - 1727
  • [6] A Simple Method for Correction of Circular Dichroism Spectra Obtained from Membrane-Containing Samples
    Chakraborty, Hirak
    Lentz, Barry R.
    [J]. BIOCHEMISTRY, 2012, 51 (05) : 1005 - 1008
  • [7] Membrane Defects Accelerate Outer Membrane β-Barrel Protein Folding
    Danoff, Emily J.
    Fleming, Karen G.
    [J]. BIOCHEMISTRY, 2015, 54 (02) : 97 - 99
  • [8] Protein-induced fusion of phospholipid vesicles of heterogeneous sizes
    de Arcuri, BF
    Vechetti, GF
    Chehín, RN
    Goñi, FM
    Morero, RD
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1999, 262 (03) : 586 - 590
  • [9] Nanodiscs in Membrane Biochemistry and Biophysics
    Denisov, Ilia G.
    Sligari, Stephen G.
    [J]. CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2017, 117 (06) : 4669 - 4713
  • [10] Physical Determinants of β-Barrel Membrane Protein Folding in Lipid Vesicles
    Dewald, Alison H.
    Hodges, Jacqueline C.
    Columbus, Linda
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 100 (09) : 2131 - 2140