The impact of a sustained oral language professional learning program on Australian early years' teachers' knowledge, practice and beliefs: a mixed-methods exploration

被引:1
作者
Stark, Hannah L. [1 ,2 ]
Eadie, Patricia A. [1 ]
Snow, Pamela C. [3 ]
Goldfeld, Sharon R. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Grad Sch Educ, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Coll Sci Hlth & Engn, La Trobe Rural Hlth Sch, Bendigo, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Parkville, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Professional learning; oral language; literacy; teacher knowledge; PRESERVICE TEACHERS; LITERACY; INTERVENTION; DIFFICULTIES; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1080/19415257.2019.1603170
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Teachers in the early years of primary school play an important role in supporting students' oral language skills; however, there is evidence to suggest many Australian teachers are not adequately prepared to provide systematic, evidence-based instruction in oral language and early literacy. The aim of this study was to describe the observed and self-perceived changes in knowledge, practice and beliefs of teachers who participated in a sustained oral language professional learning program. A second aim was to determine whether this development was adequately accounted for by current models of professionalism and professional development. Three case studies are presented, using data taken from a survey of teacher knowledge and the analysis of samples of classroom talk at three time points, and semi-structured interviews. These case studies illustrate that despite participating in the same sustained professional learning program, there was inconsistency in the teachers' outcomes. Growth in knowledge was variable; and change in self-rated ability to provide instruction was influenced by observed student outcomes (which teachers attributed to change in their practice). In one case, professional growth was restricted by factors within the school environment.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 194
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, FDN YEAR 10 CURR
[2]  
Anstey M., 1991, Australian Journal of Reading, V14, P151
[3]  
Applegate AJ, 2004, READ TEACH, V57, P554
[4]   Peter Effect in the Preparation of Reading Teachers [J].
Binks-Cantrell, Emily ;
Washburn, Erin K. ;
Joshi, R. Malatesha ;
Hougen, Martha .
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF READING, 2012, 16 (06) :526-536
[5]   Validation of an instrument for assessing teacher knowledge of basic language constructs of literacy [J].
Binks-Cantrell, Emily ;
Joshi, R. Malatesha ;
Washburn, Erin K. .
ANNALS OF DYSLEXIA, 2012, 62 (03) :153-171
[6]  
Blamey A., 2007, EVALUATION-US, V13, P439, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1356389007082129, 10.1177/1356389007082129]
[7]   Rethinking models of professional learning as tools: a conceptual analysis to inform research and practice [J].
Boylan, Mark ;
Coldwell, Mike ;
Maxwell, Bronwen ;
Jordan, Julie .
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN EDUCATION, 2018, 44 (01) :120-139
[8]   Population monitoring of language and cognitive development in Australia: The Australian Early Development Index [J].
Brinkman, Sally ;
Sayers, Mary ;
Goldfeld, Sharon ;
Kline, Jodie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2009, 11 (05) :419-430
[9]  
Buckingham J., 2013, Policy, V29, P21
[10]   Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy [J].
Cunningham, AE ;
Perry, KE ;
Stanovich, KE ;
Stanovich, PJ .
ANNALS OF DYSLEXIA, 2004, 54 (01) :139-167