Comparison of the Androgenic Response of Spring and Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

被引:13
|
作者
Weigt, Dorota [1 ]
Kiel, Angelika [1 ]
Siatkowski, Idzi [2 ]
Zyprych-Walczak, Joanna [2 ]
Tomkowiak, Agnieszka [1 ]
Kwiatek, Michal [1 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Life Sci, Dept Genet & Plant Breeding, 11 Dojazd St, PL-60637 Poznan, Poland
[2] Poznan Univ Life Sci, Dept Math & Stat Method, 28 Wojska Polskiego St, PL-60637 Poznan, Poland
来源
PLANTS-BASEL | 2020年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
androgenesis; anther culture; doubled haploid; spring wheat; winter wheat; induction medium; IN-VITRO; PLANT-REGENERATION; ANTHER-CULTURE; INDUCTION; HAPLOIDS; GENOTYPES;
D O I
10.3390/plants9010049
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Androgenesis is potentially the most effective technique for doubled haploid production of wheat. It is not however widely used in breeding programmes due to its main limitation: the genotype dependence. Due to genetic differences between spring and winter wheat, it was assumed that both phenotypes are different in their capacity to conduct androgenesis. And so, the aim of this investigation was to verify the effectiveness of androgenesis induction and plant regeneration of spring and winter wheat genotypes while considering varying amounts of growth hormones in the induction medium. Fifteen genotypes of spring wheat and fifteen of winter wheat were used in the experiment. Six hundred anthers of each of the 30 genotypes were plated and analysed. Previous studies have allowed selection of the best medium for wheat androgenesis and a combination of growth hormones that are the most effective in stimulating microspore proliferation. Therefore, C17 induction media with two combinations of growth hormones were used: I-supplemented only by auxins (2,4-D and dicamba), and II-supplemented by auxin and cytokinin (2,4-D and kinetin). Data was recorded according to the efficiency of androgenic structure formation (ASF), green plant regeneration (GPR), and albino plant regeneration (APR). The results showed that the induction and regeneration of androgenesis in the spring wheat were more efficient than in the winter ones. The spring genotypes formed more androgenic structures and green plants on anthers plated on the medium supplemented only by auxins, in contrast to the winter genotypes which were better induced and regenerated on the medium supplemented by auxin and cytokinin. The study showed that to increase the efficiency of androgenesis, it is necessary to select appropriate factors such as concentration and type of hormones in medium composition, affecting the course of the culturing procedure according to the winter or spring phenotype of donor plants.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of nutritional and technological quality of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and hybrid wheat (Triticum aestivum L. x Triticum spelta L.)
    Rajnincova, Dana
    Galova, Zdenka
    Petrovicova, Lenka
    Chnapek, Milan
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL EUROPEAN AGRICULTURE, 2018, 19 (02): : 437 - 452
  • [2] ANDROGENIC RESPONSES OF WINTER WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.) COMBINATIONS IN IN VITRO ANTHER CULTURE
    Kanbar, Osama Zuhair
    Lantos, Csaba
    Kiss, Erzsebet
    Pauk, Janos
    GENETIKA-BELGRADE, 2020, 52 (01): : 337 - 350
  • [3] Comparison of in vitro androgenic response and F1 seed production in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
    M. Hasan
    J. Pauk
    L. Jankulosky
    R. Mihály
    K. Tóth-Lőkös
    J. Falusi
    I. Petróczi
    Z. Kertész
    Cereal Research Communications, 2001, 29 : 297 - 304
  • [4] Comparison of in vitro androgenic response and F1 seed production in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
    Hasan, M
    Pauk, J
    Jankulosky, L
    Mihály, R
    Tóth-Lokös, K
    Falusi, J
    Petróczi, I
    Kertész, Z
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2001, 29 (3-4) : 297 - 304
  • [5] Malting quality of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
    Psota, Vratislav
    Musilova, Marketa
    Sachambula, Lenka
    Horakova, Vladimira
    Prinosil, Ales
    Smid, Frantisek
    Adamkova, Karolina
    Adam, Martin
    KVASNY PRUMYSL, 2018, 64 (06): : 302 - 313
  • [6] EFFICIENCY OF THE BIOSTIMULANT IN WINTER WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.)
    Turaeva, S.
    Kurbanova, E.
    Mamarozikov, U.
    Nurmakhmadova, P.
    Khidirova, N.
    Juraev, D.
    Shoymuradov, A.
    Bakhramova, N.
    Aynakulova, Z.
    SABRAO JOURNAL OF BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2024, 56 (05): : 1982 - 1993
  • [7] Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Tolerance to Mulch
    Ryan, Matthew R.
    Wayman, Sandra
    Pelzer, Christopher J.
    Peterson, Caitlin A.
    Menalled, Uriel D.
    Rose, Terry J.
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2021, 10 (10):
  • [8] Growth and yield response of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to inoculation with rhizobacteria
    Salanturi, A.
    Ozturk, A.
    Akten, S.
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 52 (03) : 111 - 118
  • [9] Genotypic variation in salinity tolerance among spring and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) accessions
    Ali, Zulfiqar
    Salam, Abdus
    Azhar, Faqir Muhammad
    Khan, Iftikhar Ahmad
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2007, 73 (01) : 70 - 75
  • [10] The adaptability of soft spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties
    Chuprina, Yu Yu
    Klymenko, I., V
    Belay, Yu M.
    Golovan, L., V
    Buzina, I. M.
    Nazarenko, V. V.
    Buhaiov, S. M.
    Mikheev, V. H.
    Laslo, O. O.
    UKRAINIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2021, 11 (01): : 267 - 272