Multi-hazard susceptibility mapping based on Convolutional Neural Networks

被引:86
作者
Ullah, Kashif [1 ]
Wang, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Zhice [1 ]
Wang, Lizhe [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Rahman, Mahfuzur [5 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Inst Geophys & Geomat, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, State Key Lab Biogeol & Environm Geol, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Geosci, Sch Comp Sci, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[4] China Univ Geosci, Hubei Key Lab Intelligent Geoinformat Proc, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[5] Int Univ Business Agr & Technol IUBAT, Dept Civil Engn, Dhaka 1230, Bangladesh
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multi; -hazard; Convolutional Neural Network; Machine learning; Eastern Hindukush; Pakistan; DEBRIS-FLOW; LANDSLIDE; RISK; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gsf.2022.101425
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Multi-hazard susceptibility prediction is an important component of disasters risk management plan. An effective multi-hazard risk mitigation strategy includes assessing individual hazards as well as their interactions. However, with the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, multi-hazard susceptibility prediction techniques based on machine learning has encountered a huge bottleneck. In order to effectively solve this problem, this study proposes a multi-hazard susceptibility mapping framework using the classical deep learning algorithm of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). First, we use historical flash flood, debris flow and landslide locations based on Google Earth images, extensive field surveys, topography, hydrology, and environmental data sets to train and validate the proposed CNN method. Next, the proposed CNN method is assessed in comparison to conventional logistic regression and k-nearest neighbor methods using several objective criteria, i.e., coefficient of determination, overall accuracy, mean absolute error and the root mean square error. Experimental results show that the CNN method outperforms the conventional machine learning algorithms in predicting probability of flash floods, debris flows and landslides. Finally, the susceptibility maps of the three hazards based on CNN are combined to create a multi-hazard susceptibility map. It can be observed from the map that 62.43% of the study area are prone to hazards, while 37.57% of the study area are harmless. In hazard-prone areas, 16.14%, 4.94% and 30.66% of the study area are susceptible to flash floods, debris flows and landslides, respectively. In terms of concurrent hazards, 0.28%, 7.11% and 3.13% of the study area are susceptible to the joint occurrence of flash floods and debris flow, debris flow and landslides, and flash floods and landslides, respectively, whereas, 0.18% of the study area is subject to all the three hazards. The results of this study can benefit engineers, disaster managers and local government officials involved in sustainable land management and disaster risk mitigation. ?? 2022 China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]   Forest fire susceptibility modeling using hybrid approaches [J].
Abedi Gheshlaghi, Hassan ;
Feizizadeh, Bakhtiar ;
Blaschke, Thomas ;
Lakes, Tobia ;
Tajbar, Sapna .
TRANSACTIONS IN GIS, 2021, 25 (01) :311-333
[2]   Factors Affecting Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: Assessing the Influence of Different Machine Learning Approaches, Sampling Strategies and Data Splitting [J].
Abraham, Minu Treesa ;
Satyam, Neelima ;
Lokesh, Revuri ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet ;
Alamri, Abdullah .
LAND, 2021, 10 (09)
[3]   Hydro-geomorphic assessment of erosion intensity and sediment yield initiated debris-flow hazards at Wadi Dahab Watershed, Egypt [J].
Abuzied, Sara M. ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet .
GEORISK-ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK FOR ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND GEOHAZARDS, 2021, 15 (03) :221-246
[4]   Geohazards Susceptibility Assessment along the Upper Indus Basin Using Four Machine Learning and Statistical Models [J].
Ahmad, Hilal ;
Ningsheng, Chen ;
Rahman, Mahfuzur ;
Islam, Md Monirul ;
Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza ;
Hussain, Syed Fahad ;
Habumugisha, Jules Maurice ;
Liu, Enlong ;
Zheng, Han ;
Ni, Huayong ;
Dewan, Ashraf .
ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2021, 10 (05)
[5]   A geospatial analysis of multi-hazard risk in Dharan, Nepal [J].
Aksha, Sanam K. ;
Resler, Lynn M. ;
Juran, Luke ;
Carstensen, Laurence W., Jr. .
GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2020, 11 (01) :88-111
[6]   Empirical assessment of rockfall and debris flow risk along the Karakoram Highway, Pakistan [J].
Ali, Sajid ;
Haider, Rashid ;
Abbas, Wahid ;
Basharat, Muhammad ;
Reicherter, Klaus .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2021, 106 (03) :2437-2460
[7]  
Allan R.P., 2021, IPCC 2021 SUMMARY PO
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Plan of Implementation. Section IV, Protecting and managing the natural resource base of economic and social development
[9]  
Atta-Ur-Rahman Shaw, 2015, DISAST RISK REDUCT, P77, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-55369-4_4
[10]   Deep Learning for Classification of Hyperspectral Data [J].
Audebert, Nicolas ;
Le Saux, Bertrand ;
Lefevre, Sebastien .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING MAGAZINE, 2019, 7 (02) :159-173