New aspects of the Slug Mucosal Irritation assay: predicting nasal stinging, itching and burning sensations

被引:14
|
作者
Lenoir, Joke [1 ]
Adriaens, Els [1 ]
Remon, Jean-Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Pharmaceut Technol Lab, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
nasal formulations; discomfort; mucosal tolerance; Slug Mucosal Irritation assay; alternative testing method; SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS; MOMETASONE FUROATE NASONEX; HUMAN RESPIRATORY MUCOSA; LONG-TERM USE; BENZALKONIUM CHLORIDE; HYPERTONIC SALINE; IN-VITRO; HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS; SPRAY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1002/jat.1610
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Stinging, itching and/or burning (SIB) sensations cannot be detected by animal tests or in vitro models. In the past, the Slug Mucosal Irritation (SMI) assay demonstrated a relation between an increased mucus production in slugs and an elevated incidence of SIB sensations in humans. A new 1-day SMI test procedure was developed focusing on the prediction of these short-term sensations. The objective of this study was to verify whether this new procedure is capable predicting mucosal tolerance of several marketed nasal formulations using the slug Arion lusitanicus. Irritation and tissue damage were quantified with a 5-day repeated exposure study by means of the mucus produced and proteins and enzymes released. The new protocol predicted SIB sensations by means of mucus production. The effects of six liquid nasal formulations were tested with both protocols, while five physiologic saline solutions were only tested with the new protocol to optimize it. None of the tested liquid nasal formulations resulted in tissue damage; however, exposure to the different formulations had a clear effect on the mucus production of the slugs and moderate discomfort was observed in some cases. These effects were due to the active ingredient, the presence of benzalkonium chloride as a preservative or the hyperosmolality of the formulation. For the most part results agreed with clinical data found in literature. It was concluded that the SMI assay, and the new 1-day protocol in particular, is a good tool to predict nasal clinical discomfort. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:640 / 648
页数:9
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] The Slug Mucosal Irritation (SMI) assay: A tool for the evaluation of nasal discomfort
    Lenoir, Joke
    Bachert, Claus
    Remon, Jean-Paul
    Adriaens, Els
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2013, 27 (06) : 1954 - 1961
  • [2] Potential Mucosal Irritation Discrimination of Surface Disinfectants Employed against SARS-CoV-2 by Limacus flavus Slug Mucosal Irritation Assay
    Cutuli, Marco Alfio
    Guarnieri, Antonio
    Pietrangelo, Laura
    Magnifico, Irene
    Venditti, Noemi
    Recchia, Laura
    Mangano, Katia
    Nicoletti, Ferdinando
    Di Marco, Roberto
    Petronio Petronio, Giulio
    BIOMEDICINES, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [3] The slug mucosal irritation (SMI) assay: Development of a screening tool for the evaluation of ocular discomfort caused by shampoos
    Lenoir, Joke
    Claerhout, Ilse
    Kestelyn, Philippe
    Klomp, Andre
    Remon, Jean-Paul
    Adriaens, Els
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2011, 25 (08) : 1919 - 1925
  • [4] Using the Slug Mucosal Irritation Assay to Investigate the Tolerability of Tablet Excipients on Human Skin in the Context of the Use of a Nipple Shield Delivery System
    Kendall, Richard
    Lenoir, Joke
    Gerrard, Stephen
    Scheuerle, Rebekah L.
    Slater, Nigel K. H.
    Tuleu, Catherine
    PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 34 (04) : 687 - 695
  • [5] Using the Slug Mucosal Irritation Assay to Investigate the Tolerability of Tablet Excipients on Human Skin in the Context of the Use of a Nipple Shield Delivery System
    Richard Kendall
    Joke Lenoir
    Stephen Gerrard
    Rebekah L. Scheuerle
    Nigel K. H. Slater
    Catherine Tuleu
    Pharmaceutical Research, 2017, 34 : 687 - 695