Does Evaluative Learning Rely on the Perception of Contingency? Manipulating Contingency and US Density During Evaluative Conditioning

被引:6
作者
Kattner, Florian [1 ]
Ellermeier, Wolfgang [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Dept Psychol, D-64283 Darmstadt, Germany
关键词
evaluative conditioning; contingency learning; outcome density effect; US density; contingency judgments; contingency awareness; associative learning; propositional learning; CONFIGURAL DISCRIMINATION PROBLEMS; OUTCOME CONTINGENCY; DEPRESSIVE REALISM; INTERTRIAL INTERVAL; BINARY VARIABLES; CAUSAL RELATIONS; AWARENESS; JUDGMENTS; HUMANS; FLAVOR;
D O I
10.1027/1618-3169/a000108
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
An experiment is reported studying the impact of objective contingency and contingency judgments on cross-modal evaluative conditioning (EC). Both contingency judgments and evaluative responses were measured after a contingency learning task in which previously neutral sounds served as either weak or strong predictors of affective pictures. Experimental manipulations of contingency and US density were shown to affect contingency judgments. Stronger contingencies were perceived with high contingency and with low US density. The contingency learning task also produced a reliable EC effect. The magnitude of this effect was influenced by an interaction of statistical contingency and US density. Furthermore, the magnitude of EC was correlated with the subjective contingency judgments. Taken together, the results imply that propositional knowledge about the CS-US relationship, as reflected in contingency judgments, moderates evaluative learning. The data are discussed with respect to different accounts of EC.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 399
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   THE EFFECT OF REPRESENTATIONS OF BINARY VARIABLES ON JUDGMENT OF INFLUENCE [J].
ALLAN, LG ;
JENKINS, HM .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1983, 14 (04) :381-405
[2]  
Allan LG, 2005, LEARN BEHAV, V33, P250
[3]  
ALLAN LG, 1980, B PSYCHONOMIC SOC, V15, P147
[4]   HUMAN CONTINGENCY JUDGMENTS - RULE-BASED OR ASSOCIATIVE [J].
ALLAN, LG .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1993, 114 (03) :435-448
[5]   The psychophysics of contingency assessment [J].
Allan, Lorraine G. ;
Hannah, Samuel D. ;
Crump, Matthew J. C. ;
Siegel, Shepard .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2008, 137 (02) :226-243
[6]   The sad truth about depressive realism [J].
Allan, Lorraine G. ;
Siegel, Shepard ;
Hannah, Samuel .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 60 (03) :482-495
[7]   JUDGMENT OF CONTINGENCY IN DEPRESSED AND NONDEPRESSED STUDENTS - SADDER BUT WISER [J].
ALLOY, LB ;
ABRAMSON, LY .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1979, 108 (04) :441-485
[8]   CAUSAL INFERENCES AS PERCEPTUAL JUDGMENTS [J].
ANDERSON, JR ;
SHEU, CF .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1995, 23 (04) :510-524
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Technical Report A-6
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Detection theory: A user's guide