Applying behaviour change theory to understand the barriers to implementing routine outcome monitoring

被引:8
作者
Bear, Holly Alice [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dalzell, Kate [4 ]
Edbrooke-Childs, Julian [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Wolpert, Miranda [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Res Dept Clin Educ & Hlth Psychol, London, England
[2] Kantor Ctr Excellence, Anna Freud Natl Ctr Children & Families, Evidence Based Practice Unit, London, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Warneford Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Oxford OX3 7JX, England
[4] Kantor Ctr Excellence, Child Outcomes Res Consortium, London, England
[5] Wellcome Trust Res Labs, London, England
关键词
behaviour change interventions; Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services; implementation; routine outcome monitoring; MEASUREMENT FEEDBACK-SYSTEM; CLINICIAN ATTITUDES; PSYCHOLOGICAL TREATMENT; PROVIDING FEEDBACK; MISSING DATA; PROGRESS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; CHILD; CONSEQUENCES; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1111/bjc.12322
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) is a valuable tool for monitoring client progress and pre-empting deterioration, however, there is considerable variation in how data are collected and recorded and uptake in clinical practice remains low. The aim of this study was to develop a self-report measure of practitioner attitudes to ROM in order to better understand the barriers to successful implementation in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). Methods An anonymous survey was completed by 184 CAMHS practitioners in the United Kingdom. The survey was designed using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B). Practitioners who reported using ROM frequently in their clinical work (53%) were compared to those who used ROM infrequently (47%) across dimensions of the COM-B survey subscales. Results Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the proposed four-factor structure, showing acceptable model fit, with high factor loadings and good reliability for all subscales. Frequent users of ROM exhibited significantly higher psychological capability, physical opportunity, social opportunity, and motivation, compared to infrequent users F (4, 140) = 14.76, p < .0001; Pillai's Trace = .297, partial eta(2) = .30. Results highlight several barriers to ROM, including the belief that there is not a strong evidence base for ROM, not receiving external training, and not discussing feedback and outcome data in supervision. Implications In the hope of improving the successful implementation of ROM, this research provides an evidence-based tool for assessing practitioners' attitudes to ROM, which map on to intervention functions and represent targets for future implementation efforts. Practitioner Points The value of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) as a means to measure client progress and to elevate the efficiency and quality of mental health care is well-documented in the research literature, however, uptake in practice remains relatively low. This study applied behaviour change theory to develop a psychometrically sound self-report measure of practitioners' perspectives and practices to understand the barriers to implementation in child and adolescent mental health services in the United Kingdom. The complex and multifaceted nature of the barriers to implementation requires multilevel behaviour change strategies at the client, clinician, and organisational level. Recommendations for practice include the need for integrated, multilevel strategies aimed at improving practitioners' capabilities and motivations, strong organisational leadership and a culture of data gathering and sharing, and implementation interventions, which are tailored to target local barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 578
页数:22
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Aarons Gregory A, 2006, Psychol Serv, V3, P61
[2]   Missing data techniques for structural equation modeling [J].
Allison, PD .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 112 (04) :545-557
[3]   A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems [J].
Atkins, Lou ;
Francis, Jill ;
Islam, Rafat ;
O'Connor, Denise ;
Patey, Andrea ;
Ivers, Noah ;
Foy, Robbie ;
Duncan, Eilidh M. ;
Colquhoun, Heather ;
Grimshaw, Jeremy M. ;
Lawton, Rebecca ;
Michie, Susan .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
[4]   Implementing routine outcome measures in child and adolescent mental health services: from present to future practice [J].
Batty, Martin J. ;
Moldavsky, Maria ;
Foroushani, Pooria Sarrami ;
Pass, Sarah ;
Marriott, Michael ;
Sayal, Kapil ;
Hollis, Chris .
CHILD AND ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH, 2013, 18 (02) :82-87
[5]   Client feedback in psychological therapy for children and adolescents with mental health problems [J].
Bergman, Hanna ;
Kornor, Hege ;
Nikolakopoulou, Adriani ;
Hanssen-Bauer, Ketil ;
Soares-Weiser, Karla ;
Tollefsen, Thomas K. ;
Bjorndal, Arild .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (08)
[6]   What information do clinicians value for monitoring adolescent client progress and outcomes? [J].
Bickman, L ;
Rosof-Williams, J ;
Salzer, MS ;
Summerfelt, WT ;
Noser, K ;
Wilson, SJ ;
Karver, MS .
PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2000, 31 (01) :70-74
[7]   A measurement feedback system (MFS) is necessary to improve mental health outcomes [J].
Bickman, Leonard .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 47 (10) :1114-1119
[8]   Implementing a Measurement Feedback System: A Tale of Two Sites [J].
Bickman, Leonard ;
Douglas, Susan R. ;
De Andrade, Ana Regina Vides ;
Tomlinson, Michele ;
Gleacher, Alissa ;
Olin, Serene ;
Hoagwood, Kimberly .
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 43 (03) :410-425
[9]   Effects of Routine Feedback to Clinicians on Mental Health Outcomes of Youths: Results of a Randomized Trial [J].
Bickman, Leonard ;
Kelley, Susan Douglas ;
Breda, Carolyn ;
de Andrade, Ana Regina ;
Riemer, Manuel .
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2011, 62 (12) :1423-1429
[10]   Attitudes toward standardized assessment tools and their use among clinicians in a public mental health service [J].
Bjaastad, Jon Fauskanger ;
Jensen-Doss, Amanda ;
Moltu, Christian ;
Jakobsen, Petter ;
Hagenberg, Heine ;
Joa, Inge .
NORDIC JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 73 (07) :387-396