Risk perception and volcanic hazard mitigation: Individual and social perspectives

被引:180
作者
Paton, Douglas [1 ]
Smith, Leigh [2 ]
Daly, Michele [3 ]
Johnston, David [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Sch Psychol, Launceston, Tas 7250, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ Technol, Sch Psychol, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Kestrel Grp, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] GNS Sci, Avalon, New Zealand
关键词
volcanic hazards; risk perception; public education; community engagement;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.026
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This paper discusses how people's interpretation of their experience of volcanic hazards and public volcanic hazard education programs influences their risk perception and whether or not they adopt measures that can mitigate their risk. Drawing on four studies of volcanic risk perception and preparedness, the paper first examines why experiencing volcanic hazards need not necessarily motivate people to prepare for future volcanic crises. This work introduces how effective risk communication requires communities and civic agencies to play complementary roles in the risk management process. Next, the findings of a study evaluating the effectiveness of a public volcanic hazard education program introduce the important role that social interaction amongst community members plays in risk management. Building on the conclusions of these studies, a model that depicts preparing as a social process is developed and tested. The model predicts that it is the quality of the relationships between people, communities and civic agencies that determines whether people adopt measures that can reduce their risk from volcanic hazard consequences. The implications of the model for conceptualizing and delivering volcanic hazard public education programs in ways that accommodate these relationships is discussed. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 188
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Adams J, 1995, RISK
[2]  
BALLANTYNE M, 2000, 20002 NUCL SCI LTD I
[3]   CHANGES IN AND GENERALIZATION OF UNREALISTIC OPTIMISM FOLLOWING EXPERIENCES WITH STRESSFUL EVENTS - REACTIONS TO THE 1989 CALIFORNIA EARTHQUAKE [J].
BURGER, JM ;
PALMER, ML .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1992, 18 (01) :39-43
[4]  
Coleman J.S., 1990, FDN SOCIAL THEORY
[5]  
Collingridge David., 1996, ACCIDENT DESIGN CONT
[6]   MYTHS OF NATURE - CULTURE AND THE SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION OF RISK [J].
DAKE, K .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1992, 48 (04) :21-37
[7]   A person-relative-to-event (PrE) approach to negative threat appeals and earthquake preparedness: A field study [J].
Duval, TS ;
Mulilis, JP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 29 (03) :495-516
[8]   Thinking aloud about trust: A protocol analysis of trust in risk management [J].
Earle, TC .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2004, 24 (01) :169-183
[9]  
Earle TimothyC., 1995, SOCIAL TRUST COSMOPO
[10]   MEASURING COMMUNITY COMPETENCE IN THE MISSISSIPPI DELTA - THE INTERFACE BETWEEN PROGRAM-EVALUATION AND EMPOWERMENT [J].
ENG, E ;
PARKER, E .
HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1994, 21 (02) :199-220