Subjective and objective evaluation of pain for older adults with knee osteoarthritis in Saudi Arabia: A reliability study

被引:6
作者
Alahmari, K. [1 ]
Silvian, S. P. [1 ]
Ahmad, I [1 ]
Reddy, R. S. [1 ]
Kakaraparthi, V. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] King Khalid Univ, Coll Appl Med Sci, Dept Med Rehabil Sci, Abha, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Inter assessor reliability; intra assessor reliability; knee osteoarthritis; pain pressure threshold; validity; visual analogue scale; PRESSURE PAIN; THRESHOLD MEASUREMENTS; DETECTABLE CHANGE; SPINAL PALPATION; ALGOMETRY; VALIDITY; BACK; MOBILIZATION; MANAGEMENT; SCORES;
D O I
10.4103/njcp.njcp_270_19
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: This study establishes the reliability and validity of pain pressure threshold (PPT) in evaluating pain for older adults with knee arthritis, and explores the importance of using a standard tool to measure pain in older adults. Methods: The study consisted of a group of 31 older adult patients with bilateral symptomatic knee osteoarthritis, intra- and inter-rater reliability, and concurrent validity that were assessed for PPT and were compared with standard visual analogue scale (VAS). Physical therapy intervention was provided to combat the pain. Results: The PPT showed excellent intra-assessor reliability by not only meeting acceptable standards but also representing very high values. The intra-assessor reliability between test sessions was excellent. The inter-assessor agreement was also very high before treatment. The highest ICC showed very good agreement (0.860) during the initial treatment for pain pressure measurement. The study also established concurrent validity of VAS and PPT (before treatment and after treatment), where the rho correlation was high (-0.708 and -0.625) and significant, indicating that PPT is adequately sensitive for detecting changes over time. Conclusion: PPT is a reliable and valid tool for measuring pain, and it helps clinicians understand the prognostic effect of the intervention, especially in older adults. The tool is consistent at measuring pain and is a valid tool compared to subjective pain scoring.
引用
收藏
页码:934 / 943
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[31]   Reliability and Usefulness of the Pressure Pain Threshold Measurement in Patients with Myofascial Pain [J].
Park, Giburm ;
Kim, Chan Woo ;
Park, Si Bog ;
Kim, Mi Jung ;
Jang, Seong Ho .
ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2011, 35 (03) :412-417
[32]   The utility and validity of pain intensity rating scales for use in developing countries [J].
Pathak, Anupa ;
Sharma, Saurab ;
Jensen, Mark P. .
PAIN REPORTS, 2018, 3 (05)
[33]  
Paungmali Aatit, 2012, Asian J Sports Med, V3, P8
[34]   Pressure algometry is a useful tool to quantify pain in the medial part of the knee: An intra- and inter-reliability study in healthy subjects [J].
Pelfort, X. ;
Torres-Claramunt, R. ;
Sanchez-Soler, J. F. ;
Hinarejos, P. ;
Leal-Blanquet, J. ;
Valverde, D. ;
Monllau, J. C. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2015, 101 (05) :559-563
[35]  
Pelfort X, 2014, Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol, V58, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.recot.2014.01.004
[36]   Reliability of spinal palpation for diagnosis of back and neck pain - A systematic review of the literature [J].
Seffinger, MA ;
Najm, WI ;
Mishra, SI ;
Adams, A ;
Dickerson, VM ;
Murphy, LS ;
Reinsch, S .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (19) :E413-E425
[37]   INTRACLASS CORRELATIONS - USES IN ASSESSING RATER RELIABILITY [J].
SHROUT, PE ;
FLEISS, JL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 86 (02) :420-428
[38]  
Stratford PW, 1996, PHYS THER, V76, P359, DOI 10.1093/ptj/76.4.359
[39]   Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire - Response [J].
Stratford, PW ;
Binkley, J ;
Solomon, P ;
Finch, E ;
Gill, C ;
Moreland, J .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1996, 76 (04) :368-368
[40]   Pressure pain algometry - A call for standardisation of methods [J].
Stubhaug, Audun .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 3 (01) :30-30