Strategic planning theory: An institutional perspective

被引:0
作者
Tambovtsev, Vitaliy L. [1 ]
Rozhdestvenskaya, Irina A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Moscow, Russia
[2] Financial Univ, Moscow, Russia
来源
TERRA ECONOMICUS | 2020年 / 18卷 / 02期
关键词
strategy; strategic plan; institutional planning theory; public sector organization; PUBLIC-SECTOR; HIGHER-EDUCATION; DECISION-MAKING; QUASI-MARKETS; MANAGEMENT; EVOLUTION; IMPLEMENTATION; ORGANIZATIONS; MANAGERIALISM; ENVIRONMENTS;
D O I
10.18522/2073-6606-2020-18-2-22-48
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The article elaborates on the essential elements of institutional theory of strategic planning (ITSP). This theory specifies the general institutional planning theory (IPT), previously presented by the authors. The differences between ITSP and other versions of IPT are described. As the analysis shows, most of current approaches either treat strategies as strategic plans or view strategy development as a stage of strategic planning. We suggest that the strategy development may even be an intuitive process, and methods of strategy development differ from the methods of strategic planning. From this perspective, we define strategic planning as a planning that is based on a previously developed strategy, the latter may be developed implicitly. Further, the authors apply this approach to the strategic planning in public organizations. Findings from the literature review show that planning in public organizations does not necessarily take into account spatial planning experience and differences in institutional environment among the countries. Strategic planning implementation success depends on interorganizational institutional environments. The strategy itself may become an important institution, once employees assume that they can benefit from the new relationships. Sensemaking and leadership can help in arriving at a strategic consensus. We argue that public sector reforms implemented according to the new public management philosophy have a negative impact on these processes.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 48
页数:27
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
Alexander, 2002, INT PLAN STUD, V7, P191, DOI 10.1080/1356347022000001871
[3]  
Alexander E R., 2007, Planning Theory, V6, P112
[4]   A TRANSACTION COST THEORY OF PLANNING [J].
ALEXANDER, ER .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 1992, 58 (02) :190-200
[5]   SHIFTING BOUNDARIES IN ECONOMICS: THE INSTITUTIONAL COGNITIVE STRAND AND THE FUTURE OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS [J].
Ambrosino, Angela ;
Fontana, Magda ;
Gigante, Anna Azzurra .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2018, 32 (03) :767-791
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1962, Proc. Am. Philos. Soc., DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-27922-523
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Sensemaking in Organizations
[8]   THE VALUE OF FORMAL PLANNING FOR STRATEGIC DECISIONS - REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL-RESEARCH [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1982, 3 (03) :197-211
[9]  
Banfield E. C., 1977, J LAW ECON, V18, P587
[10]   COGNITIVE BIASES AND THEIR IMPACT ON STRATEGIC-PLANNING [J].
BARNES, JH .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1984, 5 (02) :129-137