Local conditions and policy design determine whether ecological compensation can achieve No Net Loss goals

被引:82
作者
Sonter, Laura J. [1 ,2 ]
Simmonds, Jeremy S. [1 ,2 ]
Watson, James E. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jones, Julia P. G. [4 ]
Kiesecker, Joseph M. [5 ]
Costa, Hugo M. [3 ]
Bennun, Leon [6 ,7 ]
Edwards, Stephen [8 ]
Grantham, Hedley S. [3 ]
Griffiths, Victoria F. [9 ]
Jones, Kendall [3 ]
Sochi, Kei [5 ]
Puydarrieux, Philippe [8 ]
Quetier, Fabien [10 ]
Rainer, Helga [11 ]
Rainey, Hugo [3 ]
Roe, Dilys [12 ]
Satar, Musnanda [13 ]
Soares-Filho, Britaldo S. [14 ]
Starkey, Malcolm [6 ,7 ]
ten Kate, Kerry [15 ]
Victurine, Ray [3 ]
von Hase, Amrei [15 ]
Wells, Jessie A. [1 ]
Maron, Martine [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Global Conservat Program, New York, NY 10460 USA
[4] Bangor Univ, Coll Engn & Environm Sci, Sch Nat Sci, Bangor LL57 2UW, Gwynedd, Wales
[5] Nature Conservancy, Global Lands, Ft Collins, CO 80524 USA
[6] Biodivers Consultancy, 3E Kings Parade, Cambridge CB2 1SJ, England
[7] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Conservat Sci Grp, Downing St, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
[8] Int Union Conservat Nat, CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland
[9] Univ Oxford, Dept Zool, Zool Res & Adm Bldg,11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford OX1 3SZ, England
[10] Biotope, BP 58, F-34140 Meze, France
[11] Arcus Fdn, CB1 Business Ctr,Leda House,Twenty Stn Rd, Cambridge CB1 2JD, England
[12] Int Inst Environm & Dev IIED, London WC1X 8NH, England
[13] Yayasan Konservasi Alam Nusantara, Jakarta, Indonesia
[14] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Ctr Sensoriamento Remoto, Av Antonio Carlos 6627, BR-31270900 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[15] Forest Trends, Washington, DC 20036 USA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
BIODIVERSITY OFFSETS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LAND-USE; RESTORATION; SEDIMENT; IMPACTS; OPPORTUNITIES; MITIGATION; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-020-15861-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Many nations use ecological compensation policies to address negative impacts of development projects and achieve No Net Loss (NNL) of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, failures are widely reported. We use spatial simulation models to quantify potential net impacts of alternative compensation policies on biodiversity (indicated by native vegetation) and two ecosystem services (carbon storage, sediment retention) across four case studies (in Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, Mozambique). No policy achieves NNL of biodiversity in any case study. Two factors limit their potential success: the land available for compensation (existing vegetation to protect or cleared land to restore), and expected counterfactual biodiversity losses (unregulated vegetation clearing). Compensation also fails to slow regional biodiversity declines because policies regulate only a subset of sectors, and expanding policy scope requires more land than is available for compensation activities. Avoidance of impacts remains essential in achieving NNL goals, particularly once opportunities for compensation are exhausted. Countries are adopting ecological compensation policies aimed at achieving no net loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Here, Sonter and colleagues apply spatial simulation models to case studies in Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, and Mozambique to show that compensation alone is not sufficient to preserve biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Review of the Sustainable Development Goals: The Science Perspective
[2]   A Global Mitigation Hierarchy for Nature Conservation [J].
Arlidge, William N. S. ;
Bull, Joseph W. ;
Addison, Prue F. E. ;
Burgass, Michael J. ;
Gianuca, Dimas ;
Gorham, Taylor M. ;
Jacob, Celine ;
Shumway, Nicole ;
Sinclair, Samuel P. ;
Watson, James E. M. ;
Wilcox, Chris ;
Milner-Gulland, E. J. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2018, 68 (05) :336-347
[3]  
Bennett G., 2017, State of Biodiversity Mitigation 2017: Markets and Compensation for Global Infrastructure Development
[4]   The Sweet and the Bitter: Intertwined Positive and Negative Social Impacts of a Biodiversity Offset [J].
Bidauda, Cecile ;
Schreckenberg, Kate ;
Rabeharison, Manolotsoa ;
Ranjatson, Patrick ;
Gibbons, James ;
Jones, Julia P. G. .
CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2017, 15 (01) :1-13
[5]   Restoration to offset the impacts of developments at a landscape scale reveals opportunities, challenges and tough choices [J].
Budiharta, Sugeng ;
Meijaard, Erik ;
Gaveau, David L. A. ;
Struebig, Matthew J. ;
Wilting, Andreas ;
Kramer-Schadt, Stephanie ;
Niedballa, Juergen ;
Raes, Niels ;
Maron, Martine ;
Wilson, Kerrie A. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2018, 52 :152-161
[6]   Importance of Baseline Specification in Evaluating Conservation Interventions and Achieving No Net Loss of Biodiversity [J].
Bull, J. W. ;
Gordon, A. ;
Law, E. A. ;
Suttle, K. B. ;
Milner-Gulland, E. J. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2014, 28 (03) :799-809
[7]   Net positive outcomes for nature [J].
Bull, Joseph W. ;
Milner-Gulland, E. J. ;
Addison, Prue F. E. ;
Arlidge, William N. S. ;
Baker, Julia ;
Brooks, Thomas M. ;
Burgass, Michael J. ;
Hinsley, Amy ;
Maron, Martine ;
Robinson, John G. ;
Sekhran, Nik ;
Sinclair, Samuel P. ;
Stuart, Simon N. ;
zu Ermgassen, Sophus O. S. E. ;
Watson, James E. M. .
NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2020, 4 (01) :4-+
[8]   Implementation Gap between the Theory and Practice of Biodiversity Offset Multipliers [J].
Bull, Joseph W. ;
Lloyd, Samuel P. ;
Strange, Niels .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (06) :656-669
[9]   The global extent of biodiversity offset implementation under no net loss policies [J].
Bull, Joseph William ;
Strange, Niels .
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 1 (12) :790-798
[10]   Carbon for conservation: Assessing the potential for win-win investment in an extensive Australian regrowth ecosystem [J].
Dwyer, John M. ;
Fensham, Rod J. ;
Butler, Don W. ;
Buckley, Yvonne M. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 134 (1-2) :1-7