The relationship between academic achievement, self-efficacy, implicit theories and basic psychological needs satisfaction among university students*

被引：37

作者：

Macakova, Viviana ^{[1
]}

Wood, Clare ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Nottingham Trent Univ, Dept Psychol, 50 Shakespeare St, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, England

来源：

STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION | 2022年 / 47卷 / 02期

关键词：

Implicit theories; basic needs satisfaction; attainment; self-efficacy; growth mindset; INTELLIGENCE; MOTIVATION; SUPPORT; MODEL; PERSISTENCE; AUTONOMY; SAMPLE; GOALS; SCALE;

D O I：

10.1080/03075079.2020.1739017

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

There is limited research regarding university students' academic achievement and what influences it. We argue that university students' academic achievement could be influenced by different factors to those observed for schoolchildren. We investigated whether university students' beliefs about intelligence ('implicit theories'), self-efficacy and basic psychological needs satisfaction could explain their academic achievement. 203 students completed measures of implicit theories, self-efficacy and basic psychological needs, and provided their course grades via an online survey tool. Structural equation modelling was used to analyse the data. University students' implicit theories were indirectly associated with their academic achievement via self-efficacy. Basic psychological needs satisfaction was positively associated with self-efficacy and there was an indirect relationship between basic psychological needs satisfaction and academic achievement. Theories regarding the relationship between implicit theories and academic achievement need to be amended to account for the role of self-efficacy and basic needs satisfaction for adult learners.

引用

页码：259 / 269

页数：11

共 44 条

[1]

AUTEN MA, 2013, THESIS

[2] Growth mindset is not associated with scholastic aptitude in a large sample of university applicants [J].

Bahnik, Stepan ;

Vranka, Marek A. .

PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 117 :139-143

[3]

Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control

[4]

Beaujean A. A., 2014, LATENT VARIABLE MODE, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315869780

[5] Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention [J].

Blackwell, Lisa S. ;

Trzesniewski, Kali H. ;

Dweck, Carol Sorich .

CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 78 (01) :246-263

[6] Mind-Sets Matter: A Meta-Analytic Review of Implicit Theories and Self-Regulation [J].

Burnette, Jeni L. ;

O'Boyle, Ernest H. ;

VanEpps, Eric M. ;

Pollack, Jeffrey M. ;

Finkel, Eli J. .

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2013, 139 (03) :655-701

[7] Factor structure and dimensionality of the balanced measure of psychological needs among Portuguese high school students. Relations to well-being and ill-being [J].

Cordeiro, Pedro ;

Paixao, Paula ;

Lens, Willy ;

Lacante, Marlies ;

Sheldon, Kennon .

LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 47 :51-60

[8] Cognitive-motivational antecedents of career decision-making processes in Portuguese high school students: A longitudinal study [J].

Cordeiro, Pedro M. ;

Paixao, Maria P. ;

Lens, Willy ;

Lacante, Marlies ;

Luyckx, Koen .

JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2015, 90 :145-153

[9]

Costa Paul T., 1992, NEO PERSONALITY INVE

[10] My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: the revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement [J].

De Castella, Krista ;

Byrne, Donald .

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2015, 30 (03) :245-267

← 1 2 3 4 5 →