Correlation between the γ passing rates of IMRT plans and the volumes of air cavities and bony structures in head and neck cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Shen, Zhengwen [1 ]
Tan, Xia [1 ]
Li, Shi [1 ]
Tian, Xiumei [1 ]
Luo, Huanli [1 ]
Wang, Ying [1 ]
Jin, Fu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Canc Hosp, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
IMRT QA; gamma passing rates; Air cavities; Bony structures; Monte Carlo; ACUROS XB ALGORITHM; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; MONTE-CARLO; DOSE CALCULATION; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; DOSIMETRIC IMPACT; SURVIVAL OUTCOMES; SOURCE MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-021-01861-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Both patient-specific dose recalculation and gamma passing rate analysis are important for the quality assurance (QA) of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans. The aim of this study was to analyse the correlation between the gamma passing rates and the volumes of air cavities (V-air) and bony structures (V-bone) in target volume of head and neck cancer. Methods: Twenty nasopharyngeal carcinoma and twenty nasal natural killer T-cell lymphoma patients were enrolled in this study. Nine-field sliding window IMRT plans were produced and the dose distributions were calculated by anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA), Acuros XB algorithm (AXB) and SciMoCa based on the Monte Carlo (MC) technique. The dose distributions and gamma passing rates of the targets, organs at risk, air cavities and bony structures were compared among the different algorithms. Results: They values obtained with AAA and AXB were 95.6 +/- 1.9% and 96.2 +/- 1.7%, respectively, with 3%/2 mm criteria (p > 0.05). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the gamma values between AAA and AXB in the air cavities (86.6 +/- 9.4% vs. 98.0 +/- 1.7%) and bony structures (82.7 +/- 13.5% vs. 99.0 +/- 1.7%). Using AAA, they values were proportional to the natural logarithm of V-air (R-2 = 0.674) and inversely proportional to the natural logarithm of V-bone (R-2 =0.816). When the V-air, in the targets was smaller than approximately 80 cc or the V-bone in the targets was larger than approximately 6 cc, the gamma values of AAA were below 95%. Using AXB, no significant relationship was found between the gamma values and V-air or V-bone. Conclusion: In clinical head and neck IMRT QA, greater attention should be paid to the effect of V-air and V-bone in the targets on they passing rates when using different dose calculation algorithms.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dysphagia and aspiration after chemoradiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: Which anatomic structures are affected and can they be spared by IMRT?
    Eisbruch, A
    Schwartz, M
    Rasch, C
    Vineberg, K
    Damen, E
    Van As, CJ
    Marsh, R
    Pameijer, FA
    Balm, AJM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (05): : 1425 - 1439
  • [42] IMRT delivers lower radiation doses to dental structures than 3DRT in head and neck cancer patients
    Fregnani, E. R.
    Joffily Parahyba, C.
    Morais-Faria, K.
    Paiva Fonseca, F.
    Mendes Ramos, P. A.
    Yone de Moraes, F.
    Gondim Moutinho da Conceicao Vasconcelos, K.
    Menegucci, G.
    Santos-Silva, A. R.
    Brandao, T. B.
    ORAL DISEASES, 2016, 22 : 31 - 31
  • [43] IMRT delivers lower radiation doses to dental structures than 3DRT in head and neck cancer patients
    Fregnani, Eduardo Rodrigues
    Parahyba, Claudia Joffily
    Morais-Faria, Karina
    Fonseca, Felipe Paiva
    Mendes Ramos, Pedro Augusto
    de Moraes, Fabio Yone
    Moutinho da Conceicao Vasconcelos, Karina Gondim
    Menegussi, Gisela
    Santos-Silva, Alan Roger
    Brandao, Thais B.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11
  • [44] Assessing the correlation between Gamma passing rate and clinical dosimetric variations in breast cancer IMRT plans with multi-leaf collimator errors: perspectives from the ArcCHECK QA system
    Li, Xiuquan
    Deng, Jia
    Wu, Xiangyang
    Yang, Hang
    Huang, Dengdian
    RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS, 2024, : 55 - 65
  • [45] Correlation between imaging and tissue biomarkers of hypoxia in squamous cell cancer of the head and neck
    Kunder, Shreya
    Chatterjee, Abhishek
    Manna, Subhakankha
    Mahimkar, Manoj
    Patil, Asawari
    Rangarajan, Venkatesh
    Budrukkar, Ashwini
    Ghosh-Laskar, Sarbani
    Agarwal, Jai Prakash
    Gupta, Tejpal
    WORLD JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 20 (03) : 228 - 236
  • [46] Large discrepancies between planned and actually delivered dose in IMRT of head and neck cancer.: A case report
    Piermattei, Angelo
    Cilia, Savino
    D'Onofrio, Guido
    Grimaldi, Luca
    Digesu, Cinzia
    Macchia, Gabriella
    Deodato, Francesco
    Morganti, Alessio G.
    TUMORI, 2007, 93 (03) : 319 - 322
  • [47] Dosimetric comparison between head and neck IMRT plans generated using a biologically-based and dose-based treatment planning systems
    Senienenko, V. A.
    Qi, X. S.
    Daly, M. D.
    Schultz, C. J.
    Li, X. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S600 - S600
  • [48] Pre-treatment verification of large-field IMRT dose painting plans for head and neck cancer using a commercial QA device
    Song, Y.
    Obcemea, C.
    Muller, B.
    Mychalczak, B.
    Burman, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2560 - 2560
  • [49] Correction: Assessing the correlation between Gamma passing rate and clinical dosimetric variations in breast cancer IMRT plans with multi-leaf collimator errors: perspectives from the ArcCHECK QA system
    Xiuquan Li
    Jia Deng
    Xiangyang Wu
    Hang Yang
    Dengdian Huang
    Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 2025, 64 (2) : 337 - 337
  • [50] Dose-Effect Relationship between the dose to the Parotid gland and the incidence of acute Xerostomia in IMRT of Head and Neck Cancer
    Berger, T.
    Stegmaier, P.
    Hanser, C.
    Hodapp, N.
    Baumann, T.
    Grosu, A.
    Henke, M.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 187 : 91 - 91