Correlation between the γ passing rates of IMRT plans and the volumes of air cavities and bony structures in head and neck cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Shen, Zhengwen [1 ]
Tan, Xia [1 ]
Li, Shi [1 ]
Tian, Xiumei [1 ]
Luo, Huanli [1 ]
Wang, Ying [1 ]
Jin, Fu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Canc Hosp, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
IMRT QA; gamma passing rates; Air cavities; Bony structures; Monte Carlo; ACUROS XB ALGORITHM; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; MONTE-CARLO; DOSE CALCULATION; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; DOSIMETRIC IMPACT; SURVIVAL OUTCOMES; SOURCE MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-021-01861-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Both patient-specific dose recalculation and gamma passing rate analysis are important for the quality assurance (QA) of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans. The aim of this study was to analyse the correlation between the gamma passing rates and the volumes of air cavities (V-air) and bony structures (V-bone) in target volume of head and neck cancer. Methods: Twenty nasopharyngeal carcinoma and twenty nasal natural killer T-cell lymphoma patients were enrolled in this study. Nine-field sliding window IMRT plans were produced and the dose distributions were calculated by anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA), Acuros XB algorithm (AXB) and SciMoCa based on the Monte Carlo (MC) technique. The dose distributions and gamma passing rates of the targets, organs at risk, air cavities and bony structures were compared among the different algorithms. Results: They values obtained with AAA and AXB were 95.6 +/- 1.9% and 96.2 +/- 1.7%, respectively, with 3%/2 mm criteria (p > 0.05). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the gamma values between AAA and AXB in the air cavities (86.6 +/- 9.4% vs. 98.0 +/- 1.7%) and bony structures (82.7 +/- 13.5% vs. 99.0 +/- 1.7%). Using AAA, they values were proportional to the natural logarithm of V-air (R-2 = 0.674) and inversely proportional to the natural logarithm of V-bone (R-2 =0.816). When the V-air, in the targets was smaller than approximately 80 cc or the V-bone in the targets was larger than approximately 6 cc, the gamma values of AAA were below 95%. Using AXB, no significant relationship was found between the gamma values and V-air or V-bone. Conclusion: In clinical head and neck IMRT QA, greater attention should be paid to the effect of V-air and V-bone in the targets on they passing rates when using different dose calculation algorithms.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correlation between the γ passing rates of IMRT plans and the volumes of air cavities and bony structures in head and neck cancer
    Zhengwen Shen
    Xia Tan
    Shi Li
    Xiumei Tian
    Huanli Luo
    Ying Wang
    Fu Jin
    Radiation Oncology, 16
  • [2] THE EFFECT OF AIR CAVITIES ON THE OPTIMIZATION OF HEAD AND NECK MONACO IMRT TREATMENTS
    Batista, V.
    Malveiro, R.
    Mora, G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S507 - S507
  • [3] Dosimetric IMRT plans comparison between helical tomotherapy and linac-based IMRT for head and neck cancer
    Zefkili, S.
    Fancois, P.
    Mazal, A.
    Giraudz, P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S207 - S208
  • [4] The Effect of Shoulder Variation on IMRT and SmartArc Plans for Head and Neck Cancer
    Neubauer, Emily
    Dong, Lei
    Followill, David
    Garden, Adam
    Court, Laurence
    White, R. Allen
    Kry, Stephen F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [5] Correlation between xerostomia toxicity endopoints in head and neck cancer patients treated with IMRT
    Scrimger, R
    Parliament, M
    Thompson, H
    Jha, N
    Field, C
    Hanson, J
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 : S12 - S12
  • [6] The effect of patient geometry on the dose distributions for IMRT plans of head and neck cancer
    Helal, A. M.
    Przeslak, A. J.
    Morgan, D. A. L.
    Perkins, A. C.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 19 (03) : S31 - S31
  • [7] On the stability of dose distribution in head-and-neck cancer in forward and inverse IMRT plans
    Eenboom, F.
    Poppe, B.
    Ruehmann, A.
    Willborn, K.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2006, 182 : 107 - 107
  • [8] Comparing step-and-shoot IMRT with dynamic helical tomotherapy IMRT plans for head-and-neck cancer
    Van Vulpen, M
    Field, C
    Raaijmakers, CPJ
    Parliament, MB
    Terhaard, CHJ
    MacKenzie, MA
    Scrimger, R
    Lagendijk, JJW
    Fallone, BG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (05): : 1535 - 1539
  • [9] A Correlation Study of 2D and 3D Gamma Passing Rates for Prostate IMRT Plans
    Zhang, D.
    Wang, B.
    Deng, X.
    Ma, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3335 - 3335
  • [10] Clinical Evaluation of Fixed-Field IMRT Plans and IMAT Plans in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
    Zhang, H.
    Meyer, R.
    Naqvi, S.
    Shi, L.
    D'Souza, W.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)