Evaluating Software Engineering Simulation Games: the UGALCO framework

被引:0
作者
Peixoto, Daniela C. C. [1 ]
Resende, Rodolfo F. [2 ]
Padua, Clarindo Isaias P. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Fed Educ Tecnol, Dept Comp, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Comp Sci, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
来源
2014 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE) | 2014年
关键词
simulation games; software engineering; framework;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The increasing interest in Software Engineering simulation games leads to the problem of how to assess these games in order to measure their real benefits. Until the current days, few attempts were proposed in order to support practitioners evaluating simulation games. This paper introduces UGALCO, a five-dimension framework for simulation games evaluation. Besides a detailed assessment of player's learning, usability, motivation, and user experience, we also included a communicability evaluation from the Human Computer Interaction field. Since our framework is not prescriptive, there are no restrictions regarding its attributes, evaluation perspectives or techniques. Instead, we present how a set of tools and attributes can be used together, bringing more effective results for assessing the game as a whole. We applied this framework for the evaluation of a specific simulation game. Results indicate that this framework can be used to gain better and more understanding of simulation games aspects.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Aasheim C. L., 2010, J INFORM SYSTEMS ED, V20, P349
  • [2] Anderson L., 2009, TAXONOMY LEARNING TE
  • [3] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [4] [Anonymous], COMPUTERS ENTERTAINM
  • [5] Galvao TAB, 2012, COMM COM INF SC, V248, P52
  • [6] Barros M. O., 2006, Software Process Improvement and Practice, V11, P411, DOI 10.1002/spip.279
  • [7] BOLLIN A, 2012, P 25 IEEE C SOFTW EN, P62, DOI DOI 10.1109/CSEET.2012.18
  • [8] Chen W., 2008, P 38 ASEE IEEE FRONT
  • [9] CMMI, 2010, CMUSEI2010TR033 CMMI
  • [10] How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated?
    de Freitas, S
    Oliver, M
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2006, 46 (03) : 249 - 264