Induction of labour indications and timing: A systematic analysis of clinical guidelines />

被引:50
作者
Coates, Dominiek [1 ,3 ,7 ]
Homer, Caroline [1 ,2 ,10 ,11 ]
Wilson, Alyssa [3 ]
Deady, Louise [4 ,12 ]
Mason, Elizabeth [4 ,12 ]
Foureur, Maralyn [5 ,6 ,13 ,14 ]
Henry, Amanda [7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Hlth, Ctr Midwifery & Child & Family Hlth, Level 11,Bldg 10,235 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
[2] Burnet Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] SPHERE, Maridulu Budyari Gumal, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] South Eastern Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Hunter New England Nursing & Midwifery Res Ctr, New Lambton, Australia
[6] Univ Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
[7] UNSW, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, UNSW Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[8] St George Hosp, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] UNSW Med, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[10] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Hlth, Ctr Midwifery Child & Family Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[11] Burnet Inst, Global Womens & Newborns Hlth Working Grp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[12] South Eastern Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Redesign & Clin Serv, Nursing & Midwifery Directorate, Sutherland Hosp Locked Bag 21, Taren Point, NSW 2229, Australia
[13] HNE Nursing & Midwifery Res Ctr, James Fletcher Campus,72 Watt St, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
[14] Univ Newcastle, James Fletcher Campus,72 Watt St, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Clinical guidelines; Guideline review; AGREE II; Induction of labour; Clinical variation; QUALITY ASSESSMENT; PRETERM BIRTHS; INTERVENTIONS; MANAGEMENT; RISK; TERM;
D O I
10.1016/j.wombi.2019.06.004
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: There is widespread and some unexplained variation in induction of labour rates between hospitals. Some practice variation may stem from variability in clinical guidelines. This review aimed to identify to what extent induction of labour guidelines provide consistent recommendations in relation to reasons for, and timing of, induction of labour and ascertain whether inconsistencies can be explained by variability guideline quality. Method: We conducted a systematic search of national and international English-language guidelines published between 2008 and 2018. General induction of labour guidelines and condition-specific guidelines containing induction of labour recommendations were searched. Guidelines were reviewed and extracted independently by two reviewers. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II Instrument. Findings: Forty nine guidelines of varying quality were included. Indications where guidelines had mostly consistent advice included prolonged pregnancy (induction between 41 and 42 weeks), preterm premature rupture of membranes, and term preeclampsia (induction when preeclampsia diagnosed >= 37 weeks). Guidelines were also consistent in agreeing on decreased fetal movements and oligohydramnios as valid indications for induction, although timing recommendations were absent or inconsistent. Common indications where there was little consensus on validity and/or timing of induction included gestational diabetes, fetal macrosomia, elevated maternal body mass index, and twin pregnancy. Conclusion: Substantial variation in clinical practice guidelines for indications for induction exists. As guidelines rated of similar quality presented conflicting recommendations, guideline variability was not explained by guideline quality. Guideline variability may partly account for unexplained variation in induction of labour rates. (c) 2019 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 230
页数:12
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Quality Assessment of Asthma Clinical Practice Guidelines A Systematic Appraisal [J].
Acuna-Izcaray, Agustin ;
Sanchez-Angarita, Efrain ;
Plaza, Vicente ;
Rodrigo, Gustavo ;
Montes de Oca, Maria ;
Gich, Ignasi ;
Bonfill, Xavier ;
Alonso-Coello, Pablo .
CHEST, 2013, 144 (02) :390-397
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, IND LAB NICE CLIN GU
[3]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[5]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[6]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[7]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[8]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[9]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[10]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]