An introduction to nanotechnology policy: Opportunities and constraints for emerging and established economies

被引:58
作者
Romig, A. D., Jr. [2 ]
Baker, Arnold B. [2 ]
Johannes, Justine [2 ]
Zipperian, Thomas [2 ]
Eijkel, Kees [3 ]
Kirchhoff, Bruce [4 ]
Mani, H. S. [1 ]
Rao, C. N. R. [5 ,6 ]
Walsh, Steven [7 ]
机构
[1] Chennai Math Sci Inst, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Sandia Natl Labs, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA
[3] Mesa Inst Nanotechnol, Enschede, Netherlands
[4] New Jersey Inst Technol, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[5] Indian Inst Sci, Jawaharlal Nehru Ctr Adv Sci Res, Bangalore 560012, Karnataka, India
[6] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Mat, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[7] Univ New Mexico, Anderson Sch Management, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2007.04.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Nanotechnology has captured wide attention all over the world and excited the imagination of young and old alike. Interest in the subject has increased remarkably during the last few years because of potential technological applications, and commercial interest has skyrocketed. The promise of nanotechnology as an economic engine that can redefine the wellbeing of regions and nations is pervasive; yet the imprecise language, and overuse of the term nanotechnology, has made that term fuzzier, broader, and trendier than many imagined possible. This is especially evident in nanotechnology market projections, which rose dramatically over the past five years as more traditional "product families" were engulfed by the expanding use of the term. Government policy regarding nanotechnology has often resembled an embrace of imagination rather than a systematic use of what Sun Tzu and others have taught about strategic decision making. Further, if nanotechnology is truly the next wave of technology product paradigms, how will we provide an educated workforce to support it? Moreover, in company with these societal benefits come increased societal risks. This paper is intended to provide policy makers and strategists with observations that might limit actions such as those that led to the "over-hype" of nanotechnology and to the fear (or discounting) of societal risks. In the latter case we might learn from the experiences of policy makers connected with other emerging enabling-technology bases, such as nuclear energy and, to a lesser extent, the "dot-com" boom. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1634 / 1642
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] INNOVATION - MAPPING THE WINDS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION
    ABERNATHY, WJ
    CLARK, KB
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 1985, 14 (01) : 3 - 22
  • [2] [Anonymous], ENG MANAG J
  • [3] [Anonymous], NAN POOR OPP RISKS
  • [4] Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance
    Braun, T
    Schubert, A
    Zsindely, S
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 1997, 38 (02) : 321 - 325
  • [5] Drexler K.E., 1986, Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology
  • [6] FEYNMAN R, 1960, ENG SCI MAGAZINE, V23
  • [7] FOSTER RN, 1986, INNOVATION ATTACKER
  • [8] KIRSCHHOFF B, 1994, ENTREPRENEURSHIP DYN
  • [9] Kirzner IM, 1997, J ECON LIT, V35, P60
  • [10] Kirzner IM., 1979, PERCEPTION OPPORTUNI