Comparison of Cervical Spine Stiffness in Individuals With Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain and Asymptomatic Individuals

被引:23
作者
Ingram, Lewis A. [1 ]
Snodgrass, Suzanne J. [1 ]
Rivett, Darren A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Fac Hlth & Med, Sch Hlth Sci, Discipline Physiotherapy, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
关键词
cervical vertebrae; manual therapy; palpation; physical examination; LOW-BACK-PAIN; LUMBAR POSTEROANTERIOR FORCES; MANIPULATIVE THERAPY; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; SEGMENTAL MOTION; DISABILITY INDEX; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; POPULATION; PALPATION;
D O I
10.2519/jospt.2015.5711
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
STUDY DESIGN: Clinical measurement, cross-sectional. OBJECTIVE: To determine if spinal joint stiffness is different in individuals with nonspecific neck pain, and whether stiffness magnitude is associated with pain intensity and disability. BACKGROUND: Manual therapists commonly evaluate spinal joint stiffness in patients presenting with nonspecific neck pain. However, a relationship between stiffness and neck pain has not yet been demonstrated. METHODS: Spinal stiffness at C7 was objectively measured in participants with chronic nonspecific neck pain whose symptomatic spinal level was identified as C7 (n = 12) and in age- and sex-matched asymptomatic controls (n = 12). Stiffness (slope of the linear region of the force-displacement curve) was quantified using a device that applied 5 standardized mechanical force cycles to the C7 spinous process, while concurrently measuring displacement and resistance to movement. Stiffness was compared between groups using an independent t test. Spearman rho and Pearson r were used to determine the extent to which stiffness magnitude was associated with pain intensity (visual analog scale) and level of disability (Neck Disability Index), respectively, in the group with neck pain. RESULTS: Participants with nonspecific neck pain had greater spinal joint stiffness at C7 compared with asymptomatic individuals (mean difference, 1.78 N/mm; 95% confidence interval: 0,28, 3.27; P = .022). However, stiffness magnitude in the group with neck pain was not associated (P > .05) with pain intensity or level of disability. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that cervical spine stiffness may be greater in the presence of nonspecific neck pain. However, judgments regarding pain intensity and level of disability should not be inferred from examinations of spinal joint stiffness.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 169
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Manual physical assessment of spinal segmental motion: Intent and validity [J].
Abbott, J. Haxby ;
Flynn, Timothy W. ;
Fritz, Julie M. ;
Hing, Wayne A. ;
Reid, Duncan ;
Whitman, Julie M. .
MANUAL THERAPY, 2009, 14 (01) :36-44
[2]  
Alley J.R., 1983, The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, V27, P97
[3]  
Allison G, 2001, Physiother Res Int, V6, P145, DOI 10.1002/pri.223
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, J MAN MANIP THER
[5]  
[Anonymous], BACK PAIN SPINAL MAN
[6]   The relationship between lumbar segmental motion and pain response produced by a posterior-to-anterior force in persons with nonspecific low back pain [J].
Beneck, GJ ;
Kulig, K ;
Landel, RF ;
Powers, CM .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2005, 35 (04) :203-209
[7]   Basis for spinal manipulative therapy: A physical therapist perspective [J].
Bialosky, Joel E. ;
Simon, Corey B. ;
Bishop, Mark D. ;
George, Steven Z. .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (05) :643-647
[8]  
Boyling JD., 2004, Grieve's modern manual therapy
[9]  
Brodeur RR, 1999, JNMS-J NEUROMUSC SYS, V7, P127
[10]   Effect of direction of applied mobilization force on the posteroanterior response in the lumbar spine [J].
Caling, B ;
Lee, M .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2001, 24 (02) :71-78