Motivating Information Security Policy Compliance: Insights from Perceived Organizational Formalization

被引:23
作者
Hong, Yuxiang [1 ]
Furnell, Steven [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, England
[3] Edith Cowan Univ, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Nelson Mandela Univ, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
关键词
Organizational formalization; information security policy compliance; theory of planned behavior; PROTECTION MOTIVATION; SELF-EFFICACY; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; PAST BEHAVIOR; USER SECURITY; HABIT; DETERRENCE; INTENTION; KNOWLEDGE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/08874417.2019.1683781
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Psychological and behavioral characteristics are among the most important factors that instigate information security incidents. Although many previous studies have discussed the influencing factors of information security policy compliance behavior in an organization, few have considered the influence of organizational structures. In this study, the mechanism by which information security policy compliance behavioral intention is formed was studied by integrating the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and perceived organizational formalization. Data analysis was performed using the structural equation modeling (SEM) with data obtained from a survey of 261 company employees. The empirical results reveal that perceived organizational formalization significant affected cognitive processes theorized by TPB, behavioral habits, and deterrent certainty. This study suggests that formalized rules, procedures, and communications should be designed to improve employee information security policy compliance behavioral habits and intentions.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 28
页数:10
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior [J].
Aarts, H ;
Dijksterhuis, A .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 78 (01) :53-63
[2]   Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive [J].
Adler, PS ;
Borys, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :61-89
[3]   Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior [J].
Ajzen, I .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 32 (04) :665-683
[4]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[5]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[6]   SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY OF SELF-REGULATION [J].
BANDURA, A .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :248-287
[7]   DIFFERENTIAL ENGAGEMENT OF SELF-REACTIVE INFLUENCES IN COGNITIVE MOTIVATION [J].
BANDURA, A ;
CERVONE, D .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1986, 38 (01) :92-113
[8]  
Blumstein A., 1978, DETERRENCE INCAPACIT
[9]  
Bulgurcu B, 2010, MIS QUART, V34, P523
[10]   Predicting unethical behavior: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior [J].
Chang, MK .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 1998, 17 (16) :1825-1834