The effects of new or worsened postoperative neurological deficits on survival of patients with glioblastoma

被引:146
作者
Rahman, Maryam [1 ]
Abbatematteo, Joseph [1 ]
De Leo, Edward K. [1 ]
Kubilis, Paul S. [1 ]
Vaziri, Sasha [1 ]
Bova, Frank [1 ]
Sayour, Elias [1 ]
Mitchell, Duane [1 ]
Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Neurosurg, Box 100265, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
neurological deficit; postoperative morbidity; glioblastoma; resection; extent of resection; quality of life; oncology; GROSS TOTAL RESECTION; FLUORESCENCE-GUIDED RESECTION; 5-AMINOLEVULINIC ACID; MALIGNANT GLIOMA; AWAKE CRANIOTOMY; SURGICAL RESECTION; RADIATION-THERAPY; RESIDUAL TUMOR; EXTENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3171/2016.7.JNS16396
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE An increased extent of resection (EOR) has been shown to improve overall survival of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) but has the potential for causing a new postoperative neurological deficit. To investigate the impact of surgical neurological morbidity on survival, the authors performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical data from patients with GBM to quantify the impact of a new neurological deficit on the survival benefit achieved with an increased EOR. METHODS The data from all GBM patients who underwent resection at the University of Florida from 2010 to 2015 with postoperative imaging within 72 hours of surgery were included in the study. Retrospective analysis was performed on clinical outcomes and tumor volumes determined on postoperative and follow-up imaging examinations. RESULTS Overall, 115 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. Tumor volume at the time of presentation was a median of 59 cm(3) (enhanced on T1-weighted MRI scans). The mean EOR (+/- SD) was 94.2% +/- 8.7% (range 59.9%-100%). Almost 30% of patients had a new postoperative neurological deficit, including motor weakness, sensory deficits, language difficulty, visual deficits, confusion, and ataxia. The neurological deficits had resolved in 41% of these patients on subsequent follow-up examinations. The median overall survival was 13.1 months (95% CI 10.9-15.2 months). Using a multipredictor Cox model, the authors observed that increased EOR was associated with improved survival except for patients with smaller tumor volumes (<= 15 cm(3)). A residual volume of 2.5 cm(3) or less predicted a favorable overall survival. Developing a postoperative neurological deficit significantly affected survival (9.2 months compared with 14.7 months, p = 0.02), even if the neurological deficit had resolved by the first follow-up. However, there was a trend of improved survival among patients with resolution of a neurological deficit by the first follow-up compared with patients with a permanent neurological deficit. Any survival benefit from achieving a 95% FOR was abrogated by the development of a new neurological deficit postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Developing a new neurological deficit after resection of GBM is associated with a decrease in overall survival. A careful balance between FOR and neurological compromise needs to be taken into account to reduce the likelihood of neurological morbidity from surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 131
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] EARLY POSTOPERATIVE MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AFTER RESECTION OF MALIGNANT GLIOMA - OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF RESIDUAL TUMOR AND ITS INFLUENCE ON REGROWTH AND PROGNOSIS
    ALBERT, FK
    FORSTING, M
    SARTOR, K
    ADAMS, HP
    WILSON, CB
    KUNZE, S
    SALCMAN, M
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 1994, 34 (01) : 45 - 61
  • [2] Prognostic Value of Residual Fluorescent Tissue in Glioblastoma Patients After Gross Total Resection in 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Guided Surgery
    Aldave, Guillermo
    Tejada, Sonia
    Pay, Eva
    Marigil, Miguel
    Bejarano, Bartolome
    Idoate, Miguel A.
    Diez-Valle, Ricardo
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 72 (06) : 915 - 920
  • [3] [Anonymous], REGRESSION MODELING
  • [4] Glioma resection in a shared-resource magnetic resonance operating room after optimal image-guided frameless stereotactic resection
    Bohinski, RJ
    Kokkino, AK
    Warnick, RE
    Gaskill-Shipley, MF
    Kormos, DW
    Lukin, RR
    Tew, JM
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2001, 48 (04) : 731 - 742
  • [5] When Gross Total Resection of a Glioblastoma Is Possible, How Much Resection Should Be Achieved?
    Chaichana, Kaisorn L.
    Cabrera-Aldana, Eibar Ernesto
    Jusue-Torres, Ignacio
    Wijesekera, Olindi
    Olivi, Alessandro
    Rahman, Maryam
    Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 82 (1-2) : E257 - E265
  • [6] Establishing percent resection and residual volume thresholds affecting survival and recurrence for patients with newly diagnosed intracranial glioblastoma
    Chaichana, Kaisorn L.
    Jusue-Torres, Ignacio
    Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo
    Raza, Shaan M.
    Pascual-Gallego, Maria
    Ibrahim, Aly
    Hernandez-Hermann, Marta
    Gomez, Luis
    Ye, Xiaobu
    Weingart, Jon D.
    Olivi, Alessandro
    Blakeley, Jaishri
    Gallia, Gary L.
    Lim, Michael
    Brem, Henry
    Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2014, 16 (01) : 113 - 122
  • [7] Factors involved in maintaining prolonged functional independence following supratentorial glioblastoma resection Clinical article
    Chaichana, Kaisorn L.
    Halthore, Aditya N.
    Parker, Scott L.
    Olivi, Alessandro
    Weingart, Jon D.
    Brem, Henry
    Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 114 (03) : 604 - 612
  • [8] Perioperative complications and neurological outcomes of first and second craniotomies among patients enrolled in the Glioma Outcome Project
    Chang, SM
    Parney, IF
    McDermott, M
    Barker, FG
    Schmidt, MH
    Huang, W
    Laws, ER
    Lillehei, KO
    Bernstein, M
    Brem, H
    Sloan, AE
    Berger, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2003, 98 (06) : 1175 - 1181
  • [9] CURRAN WJ, 1992, J NEURO-ONCOL, V12, P219
  • [10] Removal of right cerebral hemisphere for certain tumors with hemiplegia - Preliminary report
    Dandy, WE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1928, 90 : 823 - 825