Nature -based innovation systems

被引:64
作者
van der Jagt, Alexander P. N. [1 ]
Raven, Rob [1 ,2 ]
Dorst, Hade [1 ]
Runhaar, Hens [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Vening Meineszgebouw A,Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Monash Univ, Monash Sustainable Dev Inst, Monash Sci Ctr, 8 Scen Blvd,Clayton Campus, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Wageningen Univ, Forest & Nat Conservat Policy Grp, Droevendaalsesteeg 3, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
URBAN GREEN-SPACE; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; SOCIOTECHNICAL-TRANSITIONS; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; POLICY-MAKERS; INFRASTRUCTURE; FRAMEWORK; CITIES; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eist.2019.09.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Transitions literature regards technologies as critical components in shifting systems towards sustainability, which has informed the development of the technology-oriented Technological Innovation System (TIS) framework. The emerging discourse on nature-based solutions (NBS) – multifunctional nature-integrated spatial planning and design innovations – raises the question to what extent TIS can account for the development and diffusion of NBS. Following a literature review, we present the Nature-Based Innovation System (NBIS) framework delineating critical factors for urban nature-based innovation. We find both commonalities and differences between TIS and NBIS, suggesting that the roles of place-based dynamics, agency and governance structure are more central to nature-based innovation, and market formation is more central to technological innovation. This has implications for the study of sustainability transitions, which has likely underplayed the potential of innovations at the nexus of socio-technical and socio-ecological systems. Future research is needed to refine the NBIS framework, for example by studying evolutionary developmental trajectories. © 2019 The Authors
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 216
页数:15
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], NATURVATION DELIVERA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Final Report of the Horizon 2020 Expert Group on Nature-Based Solutions and Re-Naturing Cities
[3]  
[Anonymous], ENV INNOVATION SOC T
[4]  
[Anonymous], TRANSITIONS SUSTAINA
[5]  
[Anonymous], USE WORKING PAPER SE
[6]   Power in Transition An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change [J].
Avelino, Flor ;
Rotmans, Jan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL THEORY, 2009, 12 (04) :543-569
[7]   Urban sustainability experiments in Asia: patterns and pathways [J].
Bai, Xuemei ;
Roberts, Brian ;
Chen, Jing .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2010, 13 (04) :312-325
[8]   Are lessons from eco-towns helping planners make more effective progress in transforming cities into sustainable urban systems: a literature review (part 2 of 2) [J].
Bayulken, Bogachan ;
Huisingh, Donald .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 109 :152-165
[9]   Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Jacobsson, Staffan ;
Carlsson, Bo ;
Lindmark, Sven ;
Rickne, Annika .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (03) :407-429
[10]   Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Hekkert, Marko ;
Jacobsson, Staffan ;
Markard, Jochen ;
Sanden, Bjoern ;
Truffer, Bernhard .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2015, 16 :51-64