The politics of socioeconomic status: how socioeconomic status may influence political attitudes and engagement

被引:45
作者
Brown-Iannuzzi, Jazmin L. [1 ]
Lundberg, Kristjen B. [2 ]
McKee, Stephanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, 171 Funkhouser Rd, Lexington, KY 40505 USA
[2] Univ Richmond, 28 Westhampton Way, Richmond, VA 23173 USA
关键词
SUBJECTIVE SOCIAL-STATUS; ECONOMIC-INEQUALITY; UNITED-STATES; INCOME; PARTICIPATION; PREFERENCES; REDISTRIBUTION; DETERMINANTS; CONVERGENCE; GOVERNMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.018
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Socioeconomic status is hypothesized to be one factor informing political attitudes and actions. Presumably, this relationship is rooted in economic self-interest, with individuals preferring policies that would benefit them financially. In addition, these economic policy preferences are assumed to translate into political action. However, the relationships between socioeconomic status and political attitudes and behavior, as well as the psychological mechanisms associated with those relationships, are not straightforward. Here, we briefly review the current state of knowledge on the relationships between socioeconomic status and political attitudes and behavior. Overall, the research suggests that while socioeconomic status informs political attitudes toward economic policies, these attitudes may not correlate with complementary political behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 14
页数:4
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   A MODEL FOR PREDICTING BEHAVIOR - THE EFFECT OF ATTITUDE AND SOCIAL-CLASS ON HIGH AND LOW VISIBILITY POLITICAL-PARTICIPATION [J].
ACOCK, AC ;
SCOTT, WJ .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1980, 43 (01) :59-72
[2]   Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women [J].
Adler, NE ;
Epel, ES ;
Castellazzo, G ;
Ickovics, JR .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 19 (06) :586-592
[3]   Social Class, Economic Inequality, and the Convergence of Policy Preferences: Evidence from 24 Modern Democracies [J].
Andersen, Robert ;
Curtis, Josh .
CANADIAN REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SOCIOLOGIE, 2015, 52 (03) :266-288
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1972, PARTICIPATION AM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, White-Collar Government, DOI 10.7208/chicago/9780226087283.001.0001
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, POLARIZED AM DANCE P
[7]   What's the matter with what's the matter with Kansas? [J].
Bartels, Larry N. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 1 (02) :201-226
[8]   Who Wants to Get to the Top? Class and Lay Theories About Power [J].
Belmi, Peter ;
Laurin, Kristin .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 111 (04) :505-529
[9]  
Berelson B. R., 1954, Voting
[10]   BEYOND SES - A RESOURCE MODEL OF POLITICAL-PARTICIPATION [J].
BRADY, HE ;
VERBA, S ;
SCHLOZMAN, KL .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1995, 89 (02) :271-294