Limitations of reconstruction - prostheses

被引:7
作者
Jaeger, M. [1 ]
Maier, D. [1 ]
Izadpanah, K. [1 ]
Strohm, P. [1 ]
Suedkamp, N. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg Klinikum, Dept Orthopadie & Traumatol, D-79106 Freiburg I Br, Germany
来源
UNFALLCHIRURG | 2011年 / 114卷 / 12期
关键词
Proximal humeral fracture; Varus displacement; Head splitting fracture; Implant failure; Fracture prosthesis; PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURES; REVERSE SHOULDER PROSTHESIS; PLATE FIXATION; OPEN REDUCTION; INTERNAL-FIXATION; HUMAN SPECIMENS; MEDIAL SUPPORT; HEAD ISCHEMIA; LOCKED PLATE; ARTHROPLASTY;
D O I
10.1007/s00113-011-2054-2
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Fractures of the proximal humerus are common, particularly seen in elderly, female patients. Using open reduction and internal fixation good clinical results can be achieved in general. But even today not every problem has been solved in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Varus displaced fractures are particularly challenging, especially when the medial column is destroyed. Anatomical reduction of the humeral head and medial bone contact are crucial for a good surgical outcome. Otherwise a secondary varus collapse and/or an implant failure are predictable. Further challenges are the intra-articular fracture patterns, as well as fractures with an initial ischemic humeral head. The indications for prosthetic replacement are always present if an initially stable internal fixation could not be achieved. The reverse fracture prostheses represent an increasingly common treatment option; however, the indication should be reserved for the elderly over 75 years.
引用
收藏
页码:1068 / 1074
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
[31]   The medial periosteal hinge, a key structure in fractures of the proximal humerus A BIOMECHANICAL CADAVER STUDY OF ITS MECHANICAL PROPERTIES [J].
Kralinger, F. ;
Unger, S. ;
Wambacher, M. ;
Smekal, V. ;
Schmoelz, W. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2009, 91B (07) :973-976
[32]  
KRAPPINGER D, 2011, INJURY
[33]   Prognostic factors for unstable proximal humeral fractures treated with locking-plate fixation [J].
Lee, Churl-Woo ;
Shin, Sang-Jin .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2009, 18 (01) :83-88
[34]   The Biomechanics of Locked Plating for Repairing Proximal Humerus Fractures With or Without Medial Cortical Support [J].
Lescheid, Jon ;
Zdero, Rad ;
Shah, Suraj ;
Kuzyk, Paul R. T. ;
Schemitsch, Emil H. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 69 (05) :1235-1242
[35]   Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens [J].
Lill, H ;
Hepp, P ;
Korner, J ;
Kassi, JP ;
Verheyden, AP ;
Josten, C ;
Duda, GN .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2003, 123 (2-3) :74-81
[36]  
MAJED A, 2011, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V20, P827
[37]   Medial support by fibula bone graft in angular stable plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures: an in vitro study with synthetic bone [J].
Osterhoff, Georg ;
Baumgartner, Daniel ;
Favre, Philippe ;
Wanner, Guido A. ;
Gerber, Hans ;
Simmen, Hans-Peter ;
Werner, Clement M. L. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2011, 20 (05) :740-746
[38]   Displacement/Screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of humeral fractures [J].
Owsley, Kevin C. ;
Gorczyca, John T. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (02) :233-240
[39]   Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures [J].
Palvanen, Mika ;
Kannus, Pekka ;
Niemi, Seppo ;
Parkkari, Jari .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (442) :87-92
[40]  
Plecko Michael, 2005, Oper Orthop Traumatol, V17, P25