mFOLFOXIRI versus mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Ding, Miaomiao [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jianwei [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Huabin [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Ling, Jiayu [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Zehua [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jianxia [1 ,2 ]
Li, Weiwei [1 ,2 ]
Deng, Yanhong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Prov Key Lab Colorectal & Pelv Floor Di, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Locally advanced rectal cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; mFOLFOXIRI; mFOLFOX6; Propensity score matching; METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CANCER; FOLFOXIRI PLUS BEVACIZUMAB; MEDIAN FOLLOW-UP; PHASE-III TRIAL; OPEN-LABEL; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; MULTICENTER; RADIOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.clcc.2021.11.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, CRT failed to impact metastatic recurrence and the risk of side effects on bowel and genitourinary remained a concern. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone with mFOLFOX6 or FOLFOXIRI had been investigated in LARC. Here, we tried to compare the efficacy of mFOLFOXIRI with mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LARC. Patients and Methods: Between January 2014 and December 2019, patients with LARC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI or mFOLFOX6 were retrospective analyzed, including data from a prospective trial (NCT02217020). All patients underwent total mesorectal excision (TME). The propensity-score matching was preformed to adjust baseline potential confounders and to estimate differences in outcomes between patients receiving mFOLFOXIRI and mFOLFOX6. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional regression analysis. Results: The median follow-up time was 31.1 months. After propensity score matching, 156 patients were available for comparison in each group. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 17.9% vs. 5.1% (P< .001), the incidence rate of anastomotic fistula was 3.2% vs. 9% (P = .03), the 3 year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 75% vs. 66.7% (P = .047) and the distant metastasis rate was 16.4% versus 26.6% (P = .013) for mFOLFOXIRI and mFOLFOX6 group, respectively. Patients receiving mFOLFOXIRI had higher incidence of grade Ill and/or IV nausea and/or vomiting (7.6% vs. 2.5%, P = .04). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI regimens improved pCR rate and survival outcome, reduced the rate of distant metastasis and anastomotic fistula when comparing with propensityscore matched controls of mFOLFOX6 neoadjuvant chemotherapy.MicroAbstract: This trial assessed the shortterm and long-term effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI and mFOLFOX6 in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Comparing with propensity-score matched historical control of chemoradiotherapy, neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI chemotherapy was well tolerated and led to higher rates of 3 year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:E12 / E20
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Triplet versus doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Yonghe Chen
    Jiasheng He
    Dan Liu
    Jian Xiao
    Xijie Chen
    Haijie Tang
    Dandong Luo
    Chenyu Shang
    Lei Lian
    Junsheng Peng
    BMC Cancer, 21
  • [2] Triplet versus doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Chen, Yonghe
    He, Jiasheng
    Liu, Dan
    Xiao, Jian
    Chen, Xijie
    Tang, Haijie
    Luo, Dandong
    Shang, Chenyu
    Lian, Lei
    Peng, Junsheng
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [3] Intensified Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Intensified Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    De Felice, Francesca
    Musio, Daniela
    Iafrate, Franco
    Caponnetto, Salvatore
    Picone, Vincenzo
    D'ambrosio, Giancarlo
    Magliocca, Fabio Massimo
    Tozzi, Francesca
    De Toma, Giorgio
    Tombolini, Vincenzo
    Cortesi, Enrico
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 42 (02) : 991 - 1000
  • [4] Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer
    Lin, Huaqin
    Wang, Lei
    Zhong, Xiaohong
    Zhang, Xueqing
    Shao, Lingdong
    Wu, Junxin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [5] Randomized phase II study comparing the efficacy and safety of SOX versus mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (KSCC1301)
    Miwa, Keisuke
    Oki, Eiji
    Enomoto, Masanobu
    Ihara, Keisuke
    Ando, Koji
    Fujita, Fumihiko
    Tominaga, Masahiro
    Mori, Shinichiro
    Nakayama, Goro
    Shimokawa, Mototsugu
    Saeki, Hiroshi
    Baba, Hideo
    Mori, Masaki
    Akagi, Yoshito
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [6] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With mFOLFOXIRI Without Routine Use of Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Zhang, Jianwei
    Huang, Meijin
    Cai, Yue
    Wang, Lei
    Xiao, Jian
    Lan, Ping
    Hu, Huabin
    Wu, Xiaojian
    Ling, Jiayu
    Peng, Junsheng
    Chen, Dianke
    Kang, Liang
    Zhang, Yan
    Ren, Donglin
    Wang, Hui
    Chen, Shuang
    Lin, Feng
    Zheng, Jian
    Zhou, Zhiyang
    Wang, Jianping
    Deng, Yanhong
    CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2019, 18 (04) : 238 - 244
  • [7] Prolonged neoadjuvant chemotherapy without radiation versus total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: A propensity score matched study
    Zhao, Xuan
    Han, Peiyi
    Zhang, Luyang
    Ma, Junjun
    Dong, Feng
    Zang, Lu
    He, Zirui
    Zheng, Minhua
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [8] Importance of the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score to the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for locally advanced rectal cancer
    Mukai, Toshiki
    Uehara, Keisuke
    Aiba, Toshisada
    Ogura, Atsushi
    Tsuzuki, Toyonori
    Tanaka, Aya
    Sando, Masanori
    Ohara, Noriyuki
    Sato, Yusuke
    Hattori, Norifumi
    Nakayama, Goro
    Kodera, Yasuhiro
    Nagino, Masato
    SURGERY TODAY, 2020, 50 (08) : 912 - 919
  • [9] Retrospective Comparison of mFOLFOXIRI With XELOX/SOX as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Kodama, Hiroyuki
    Terazawa, Tetsuji
    Ishizuka, Yasunobu
    Yukami, Hiroki
    Aoki, Masahiko
    Miyamoto, Takahiro
    Yamaguchi, Toshifumi
    Shimamoto, Futukaro
    Kii, Takayuki
    Goto, Masahiro
    Hamamoto, Hiroki
    Osumi, Wataru
    Yamamoto, Masashi
    Tanaka, Keitaro
    Okuda, Jyunji
    Uchiyama, Kazuhisa
    Higuchi, Kazuhide
    IN VIVO, 2021, 35 (02): : 977 - 985
  • [10] Comparison of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Sugimura, Keijiro
    Motoori, Masaaki
    Kentaro, Kishi
    Yamamoto, Kazuyoshi
    Takeno, Atsushi
    Hara, Hisashi
    Hamakawa, Takuya
    Murakami, Kohei
    Nakahara, Yujiro
    Masuzawa, Toru
    Omori, Takeshi
    Kurokawa, Yukinori
    Fujitani, Kazumasa
    Doki, Yuichiro
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2025, 39 (04): : 2304 - 2315