Effects of the TRIAL classroom model on the self-regulation of primary education students against traditional methodology

被引:0
作者
Martinez de Ojeda, Diego [1 ]
Mendez-Gimenez, Antonio [2 ]
Gutierrez Sanchez-Osorio, Maria Lucia [1 ]
Lopez Delgado, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Consejeria Educ & Cultura Reg Murcia, Murcia, Spain
[2] Univ Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
来源
ESPIRAL-CUADERNOS DEL PROFESORADO | 2020年 / 13卷 / 26期
关键词
TRIAL Classroom; teaching model; primary education; ACHIEVEMENT; METAANALYSIS; STRATEGIES; COMPONENTS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The TRIAL Classroom model was conceived to generate authentic learning experiences in the classroom and was designed based on the hybridization of three teaching models: Sports Education, Cooperative Learning and Project Based Learning. To date, works have been found that show positive results in terms of competence and in the different objectives that define the model. However, there is no evidence of studies that deepen in establishing the self-regulated connections that occur when implementing TRIAL Classroom nor there is a comparison with the traditional methodology. The objective of this study has been to analyze the students' self-regulation when participating in the implementation of the TRIAL Classroom model against the traditional methodology. In order to collect data in order to analyze them and respond to the proposed objective, a questionnaire was administered before the beginning of the experience and at the end of it. The experience involved 61 students enrolled in three classes belonging to two schools in the Murcia Region of primary education room. Two classes implemented the TRIAL Classroom model and the other (control group) implemented the traditional methodology. The results indicated significant differences in the different subscales in favor of the TRIAL Classroom model.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 96
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]   How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes [J].
Dignath, Charlotte ;
Buettner, Gerhard ;
Langfeldt, Hans-Peter .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2008, 3 (02) :101-129
[12]  
Ennis Catherine D, 2014, Kinesiol Rev (Champaign), V3, P63
[13]  
Ennis CD., 2012, Research methods in physical education and youth sport, P217
[14]  
Ferrer Esteban G., 2005, EDUCAR
[15]  
Graham S., 2006, HDB WRITING RES, P187, DOI [10.1111/j.1467-873x.2008.00423.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1467-873X.2008.00423.X]
[16]  
Hambleton RK., 2011, Cross-cultural research methods in psychology, P46, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511779381.004
[17]  
Johnson D.W., 1994, COOPERATIVE LEARNING
[18]  
Jones B.F., 1997, REAL LIFE PROBLEM SO, DOI [10.1037/10266-000, DOI 10.1037/10266-000]
[19]  
Joyce B., 1980, MODELS TEACHING, V2nd
[20]  
Lincoln Y., 1985, Naturalistic inquiry, P289, DOI DOI 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8