Validation of a fully automated liver segmentation algorithm using multi-scale deep reinforcement learning and comparison versus manual segmentation

被引:30
作者
Winkel, David J. [1 ,2 ]
Weikert, Thomas J. [1 ]
Breit, Hanns-Christian [1 ]
Chabin, Guillaume [2 ]
Gibson, Eli [2 ]
Heye, Tobias J. [1 ]
Comaniciu, Dorin [2 ]
Boll, Daniel T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Basel, Dept Radiol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Med Imaging Technol, Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ USA
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Algorithms; Reproducibility of results; Tomography; X-ray computed; Liver; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; VOLUMETRY; CT; TRANSPLANTATION; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108918
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) based software solution tested on liver volumetric analyses and to compare the results to the manual contour segmentation. Materials and methods: We retrospectively obtained 462 multiphasic CT datasets with six series for each patient: three different contrast phases and two slice thickness reconstructions (1.5/5 mm), totaling 2772 series. AI-based liver volumes were determined using multi-scale deep-reinforcement learning for 3D body markers detection and 3D structure segmentation. The algorithm was trained for liver volumetry on approximately 5000 datasets. We computed the absolute error of each automatically- and manually-derived volume relative to the mean manual volume. The mean processing time/dataset and method was recorded. Variations of liver volumes were compared using univariate generalized linear model analyses. A subgroup of 60 datasets was manually segmented by three radiologists, with a further subgroup of 20 segmented three times by each, to compare the automatically-derived results with the ground-truth. Results: The mean absolute error of the automatically-derived measurement was 44.3 mL (representing 2.37 % of the averaged liver volumes). The liver volume was neither dependent on the contrast phase (p = 0.697), nor on the slice thickness (p = 0.446). The mean processing time/dataset with the algorithm was 9.94 s (sec) compared to manual segmentation with 219.34 s. We found an excellent agreement between both approaches with an ICC value of 0.996. Conclusion: The results of our study demonstrate that AI-powered fully automated liver volumetric analyses can be done with excellent accuracy, reproducibility, robustness, speed and agreement with the manual segmentation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [2] Liver volumetry plug and play: Do it yourself with ImageJ
    Dello, Simon A. W. G.
    van Dam, Ronald M.
    Slangen, Jules J. G.
    de Poll, Marcel C. G. van
    Bemelmans, Marc H. A.
    Greve, Jan Willem W. M.
    Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.
    Wigmore, Stephen J.
    Dejong, Cornelis H. C.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 31 (11) : 2215 - 2221
  • [3] Computer-aided liver volumetry: performance of a fully-automated, prototype post-processing solution for whole-organ and lobar segmentation based on MDCT imaging
    Fananapazir, Ghaneh
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Marin, Daniele
    Boll, Daniel T.
    [J]. ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (05): : 1203 - 1212
  • [4] 3D CT modeling of hepatic vessel architecture and volume calculation in living donated liver transplantation
    Frericks, BB
    Caldarone, FC
    Nashan, B
    Savellano, DH
    Stamm, G
    Kirchhoff, TD
    Shin, HO
    Schenk, A
    Selle, D
    Spindler, W
    Klempnauer, J
    Peitgen, HO
    Galanski, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (02) : 326 - 333
  • [5] Multi-Scale Deep Reinforcement Learning for Real-Time 3D-Landmark Detection in CT Scans
    Ghesu, Florin-Cristian
    Georgescu, Bogdan
    Zheng, Yefeng
    Grbic, Sasa
    Maier, Andreas
    Hornegger, Joachim
    Comaniciu, Dorin
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 41 (01) : 176 - 189
  • [6] Liver segmentation: indications, techniques and future directions
    Gotra, Akshat
    Sivakumaran, Lojan
    Chartrand, Gabriel
    Kim-Nhien Vu
    Vandenbroucke-Menu, Franck
    Kauffmann, Claude
    Kadoury, Samuel
    Gallix, Benoit
    de Guise, Jacques A.
    Tang, An
    [J]. INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2017, 8 (04): : 377 - 392
  • [7] Comparison of MRI- and CT-based semiautomated liver segmentation: a validation study
    Gotra, Akshat
    Chartrand, Gabriel
    Vu, Kim-Nhien
    Vandenbroucke-Menu, Franck
    Massicotte-Tisluck, Karine
    de Guise, Jacques A.
    Tang, An
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 42 (02) : 478 - 489
  • [8] Validation of a Semiautomated Liver Segmentation Method Using CT for Accurate Volumetry
    Gotra, Akshat
    Chartrand, Gabriel
    Massicotte-Tisluck, Karine
    Morin-Roy, Florence
    Vandenbroucke-Menu, Franck
    de Guise, Jacques A.
    Tang, An
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (09) : 1088 - 1098
  • [9] Hahn Seokyung, 2012, Korean J Pediatr, V55, P403, DOI 10.3345/kjp.2012.55.11.403
  • [10] Liver segmentation in living liver transplant donors: Comparison of semiautomatic and manual methods
    Hermoye, L
    Laamari-Azjal, I
    Cao, ZJ
    Annet, L
    Lerut, J
    Dawant, BM
    Van Beers, BE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (01) : 171 - 178