Global Container Port Network Linkages and Topology in 2021

被引:16
作者
Kang, Lu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Wenzhou [1 ,3 ]
Yu, Hao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Su, Fenzhen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, State Key Lab Resources & Environm Informat Syst, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr South China Sea Studies, Nanjing 210093, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
global liner shipping network; port accessibility; Space-L; complex network; maritime transport; shipping community detection; CONNECTIVITY; VULNERABILITY; CENTRALITY;
D O I
10.3390/s22155889
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The maritime transport of containers between ports accounts for the bulk of global trade by weight and value. Transport impedance among ports through transit times and port infrastructures can, however, impact accessibility, trade performance, and the attractiveness of ports. Assessments of the transit routes between ports based on performance and attractiveness criteria can provide a topological liner shipping network that quantifies the performance profile of ports. Here, we constructed a directed global liner shipping network (GLSN) of the top six liner shipping companies between the ports of Africa, Asia, North/South America, Europe, and Oceania. Network linkages and community groupings were quantified through a container port accessibility evaluation model, which quantified the performance of the port using betweenness centrality, the transport impedance among ports with the transit time, and the performance of ports using the Port Liner Shipping Connectivity Index. The in-degree and out-degree of the GLSN conformed to the power-law distribution, respectively, and their R-square fitting accuracy was greater than 0.96. The community partition illustrated an obvious consistence with the actual trading flow. The accessibility evaluation result showed that the ports in Asia and Europe had a higher accessibility than those of other regions. Most of the top 30 ports with the highest accessibility are Asian (17) and European (10) ports. Singapore, Port Klang, and Rotterdam have the highest accessibility. Our research may be helpful for further studies such as species invasion and the planning of ports.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Barabasi A.-L., 2016, NETW SCI, P88
  • [2] Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
    Blondel, Vincent D.
    Guillaume, Jean-Loup
    Lambiotte, Renaud
    Lefebvre, Etienne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT, 2008,
  • [3] Vulnerability of international freight flows to shipping network disruptions: A multiplex network perspective
    Calatayud, Agustina
    Mangan, John
    Palacin, Roberto
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2017, 108 : 195 - 208
  • [4] An Analysis of Shipping Agreements: The Cooperative Container Network
    Caschili, Simone
    Medda, Francesca
    Parola, Francesco
    Ferrari, Claudio
    [J]. NETWORKS & SPATIAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 14 (3-4) : 357 - 377
  • [5] An eigenvector centrality analysis of world container shipping network connectivity
    Cheung, Kam-Fung
    Bell, Michael G. H.
    Pan, Jing-Jing
    Perera, Supun
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2020, 140
  • [6] Clauset A, 2004, PHYS REV E, V70, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111
  • [7] The geography of maritime networks: A critical review
    Ducruet, Cesar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 88
  • [8] Centrality and vulnerability in liner shipping networks: revisiting the Northeast Asian port hierarchy
    Ducruet, Cesar
    Lee, Sung-Woo
    Ng, Adolf K. Y.
    [J]. MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2010, 37 (01) : 17 - 36
  • [9] Clustering in complex directed networks
    Fagiolo, Giorgio
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2007, 76 (02)
  • [10] Fugazza M., 2017, J SHIPPING TRADE, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.1186/S41072-017-0019-5