Nonspatial attentional capture by previously rewarded scene semantics

被引:49
作者
Failing, Michel Fabian [1 ]
Theeuwes, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Cognit Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Reward learning; Signal detection theory; Visual cognition; Nonspatial attention; Reward; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TOP-DOWN; BLINK; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1080/13506285.2014.990546
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent research has shown that reward influences visual perception and cognition in a way that is distinct from the well-documented goal-directed mechanisms. In the current study we explored how task-irrelevant stimulus-reward associations affect processing of stimuli when attention is constrained and reward no longer delivered. During a training phase, participants performed a choice game, exposing them to different reward schedules for different semantic categories of natural scene pictures. In a separate test session in which no additional reward was provided, the differentially rewarded scene categories were used as task-irrelevant non-targets in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task. Participants performed a detection task on a previously non-rewarded target category. Results show that participants' sensitivity index (d ') for target detection decreased as a function of whether the reward was coupled to the distractor category during training. The semantic category of natural scenes associated with high reward caused more interference in target detection than the semantic category associated with a low reward. The same was found when new, unseen distractor pictures of the same semantic categories were used. The present findings suggest that reward can be selectively associated with high level scene semantics. We argue that learned stimulus-reward associations persistently bias perceptual processing independently of spatial shifts in attention and the immediate prospect of reward.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 104
页数:23
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection [J].
Anderson, Brian A. .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2013, 13 (03)
[2]   Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: Evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Folk, Charles L. .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2012, 74 (06) :1183-1198
[3]   Learned Value Magnifies Salience-Based Attentional Capture [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Laurent, Patryk A. ;
Yantis, Steven .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11)
[4]   Value-driven attentional capture [J].
Anderson, Brian A. ;
Laurent, Patryk A. ;
Yantis, Steven .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2011, 108 (25) :10367-10371
[5]   Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy [J].
Awh, Edward ;
Belopolsky, Artem V. ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (08) :437-443
[6]   Affective neuroscience of pleasure: reward in humans and animals [J].
Berridge, Kent C. ;
Kringelbach, Morten L. .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 199 (03) :457-480
[7]   Once the money is in sight: Distinctive effects of conscious and unconscious rewards on task performance [J].
Bijleveld, Erik ;
Custers, Ruud ;
Aarts, Henk .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 47 (04) :865-869
[8]   The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory [J].
Bowman, Howard ;
Wyble, Brad .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 114 (01) :38-70
[9]   Rewards teach visual selective attention [J].
Chelazzi, Leonardo ;
Perlato, Andrea ;
Santandrea, Elisa ;
Della Libera, Chiara .
VISION RESEARCH, 2013, 85 :58-72
[10]   Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method [J].
Cousineau, Denis .
TUTORIALS IN QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 1 (01) :42-45