Machine Learning-Driven Virtual Bidding With Electricity Market Efficiency Analysis

被引:12
作者
Li, Yinglun [1 ]
Yu, Nanpeng [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
关键词
Portfolios; Sensitivity; Electricity supply industry; Predictive models; Optimization; Companies; Forecasting; Electricity markets; machine learning; virtual bidding; market efficiency; EQUILIBRIUM; PREDICTION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2021.3096469
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper develops a machine learning-driven portfolio optimization framework for virtual bidding in electricity markets considering both risk constraint and price sensitivity. The algorithmic trading strategy is developed from the perspective of a proprietary trading firm to maximize profit. A recurrent neural network-based Locational Marginal Price (LMP) spread forecast model is developed by leveraging the inter-hour dependencies of the market clearing algorithm. The LMP spread sensitivity with respect to net virtual bids is modeled as a monotonic function with the proposed constrained gradient boosting tree. We leverage the proposed algorithmic virtual bid trading strategy to evaluate both the profitability of the virtual bid portfolio and the efficiency of U.S. wholesale electricity markets. The comprehensive empirical analysis on PJM, ISO-NE, and CAISO indicates that the proposed virtual bid portfolio optimization strategy considering the price sensitivity explicitly outperforms the one that neglects the price sensitivity. The Sharpe ratio of virtual bid portfolios for all three electricity markets are much higher than that of the S&P 500 index. It was also shown that the efficiency of CAISO's two-settlement system is lower than that of PJM and ISO-NE.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 364
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] A Multi-Stage Price Forecasting Model for Day-Ahead Electricity Markets
    Angamuthu Chinnathambi, Radhakrishnan
    Mukherjee, Anupam
    Campion, Mitch
    Salehfar, Hossein
    Hansen, Timothy M.
    Lin, Jeremy
    Ranganathan, Prakash
    [J]. FORECASTING, 2019, 1 (01): : 26 - 46
  • [2] Coherent measures of risk
    Artzner, P
    Delbaen, F
    Eber, JM
    Heath, D
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 1999, 9 (03) : 203 - 228
  • [3] Affinely Adjustable Robust Bidding Strategy for a Solar Plant Paired With a Battery Storage
    Attarha, Ahmad
    Amjady, Nima
    Dehghan, Shahab
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2019, 10 (03) : 2629 - 2640
  • [4] Algorithmic Bidding for Virtual Trading in Electricity Markets
    Baltaoglu, Sevi
    Tong, Lang
    Zhao, Qing
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (01) : 535 - 543
  • [5] Birge J., 2017, LIMITS ARBITRAGE ELE
  • [6] Bliek C., 2014, P 26 RAMP S, P16
  • [7] XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
    Chen, Tianqi
    Guestrin, Carlos
    [J]. KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, : 785 - 794
  • [8] ARIMA models to predict next-day electricity prices
    Contreras, J
    Espínola, R
    Nogales, FJ
    Conejo, AJ
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2003, 18 (03) : 1014 - 1020
  • [9] Drucker H, 1997, ADV NEUR IN, V9, P155
  • [10] The price prediction for the energy market based on a new method
    Ebrahimian, Homayoun
    Barmayoon, Saeed
    Mohammadi, Mohsen
    Ghadimi, Noradin
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2018, 31 (01): : 313 - 337