Comparison of rowing on a Concept 2 stationary and dynamic ergometer

被引:0
作者
Benson, Aaron [1 ]
Abendroth, Julianne [1 ]
King, Deborah [1 ]
Swensen, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Ithaca Coll, Dept Exercise & Sport Sci, Ctr Hlth Sci, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
关键词
Biomechanics; physiological response; stroke rate; efficiency; cadence; CYCLING EXPERIENCE; FORCE; POWER; PERFORMANCE; RESPONSES; EXERCISE; CADENCES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Biomechanical and physiological responses to rowing 1000 m at a power output equivalent to a 2000 m race were compared in 34 collegiate rowers (17 women, 17 men) rowing on a stationary and dynamic Concept 2 ergometer. Stroke ratio, peak handle force, rate of force development, impulse, and respiratory exchange ratio decreased by 15.7, 14.8, 10.9, 10.2 and 1.9%, respectively, on the dynamic ergometer. In contrast, percent time to peak force and stroke rate increased by 10.5 and 12.6%, respectively, during dynamic ergometry; the changes in stroke rate and impulse were greater for men than women. Last, VO2 was 5.1% higher and efficiency 5.3% lower on the dynamic ergometer for men. Collegiate rowers used higher stoke rates and lower peak stroke forces to achieve a similar power output while rowing at race pace on the dynamic ergometer, which may have increased the cardiopulmonary demand and possibly reduced force production in the primary movers. Differences were more pronounced in males than females; this dichotomy may be more due to dynamic ergometer familiarity than sex.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 273
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Effects of elbow flexion at the catch position on the force profile of ergonometric rowing [J].
Benson, A ;
Abendroth-Smith, J .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2004, 36 (05) :S137-S137
[2]   An ergonomic comparison of rowing machine designs: possible implications for safety [J].
Bernstein, IA ;
Webber, O ;
Woledge, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2002, 36 (02) :108-112
[3]  
Brooks GA., 2000, Exercise Physiology: Human Bioenergetics and its Applications, V3rd
[4]   Cycling efficiency and pedalling frequency in road cyclists [J].
Chavarren, J ;
Calbet, JAL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 80 (06) :555-563
[5]  
COAST R, 1985, EUROPEAN J APPL PHYS, V53, P339
[6]  
COHEN J., 1969, Statistical power analysis
[7]   Fixed versus free-floating stretcher mechanism in rowing ergometers:: Mechanical aspects [J].
Colloud, F ;
Bahuaud, P ;
Doriot, N ;
Champely, S ;
Chèze, L .
JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2006, 24 (05) :479-493
[8]   The rowing cycle: Sources of variance and invariance in ergometer and on-the-water performance [J].
Dawson, RG ;
Lockwood, RJ ;
Wilson, JD ;
Freeman, G .
JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 1998, 30 (01) :33-43
[9]  
Elliott Bruce, 2002, Sports Biomech, V1, P123, DOI 10.1080/14763140208522791
[10]   EFFECT OF PEDALING RATE ON SUBMAXIMAL EXERCISE RESPONSES OF COMPETITIVE CYCLISTS [J].
HAGBERG, JM ;
MULLIN, JP ;
GIESE, MD ;
SPITZNAGEL, E .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1981, 51 (02) :447-451