How to measure information similarity in online social networks: A case study of Citeulike

被引:15
作者
Lee, Danielle H. [1 ]
Brusilovsky, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Adapt Interact Co, 1460-1 Bangbae Dong, Seoul 06568, South Korea
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Informat Sci, 135 N Bellefield Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
Information similarity; Online social networks; Watching relations; Group membership; Social tags; Citeulike; RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS; TAGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2017.07.034
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In our current knowledge-driven society, many information systems encourage users to utilize their online social connections' information collections actively as useful sources. The abundant information-sharing activities among online social connections could be valuable in enhancing and developing a sophisticated user information model. In order to leverage the shared information as a user information model, our preliminary job is to determine how to measure effectively the resulting patterns. However, this task is not easy, due to multiple aspects of information and the diversity of information preferences among social connections. Which similarity measure is the most representable for the common interests of multifaceted information among online social connections? This is the main question we will explore in this paper. In order to answer this question, we considered users' self-defined online social connections, specifically in Citeulike, which were built around an object-centered sociality as the gold standard of shared interests among online social connections. Then, we computed the effectiveness of various similarity measures in their capabilities to estimate shared interests. The results demonstrate that, instead of focusing on monotonous bookmark-based similarities, it is significantly better to zero in on more cognitively expressible metadata-based similarities in accounting for shared interests. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 60
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Akcora C. G., 2011, P IEEE INT C INF REU
[2]  
Anderson Ashton., 2012, Proceedings of the 5th ACM Symposium on Web Search and Data Mining WSDM 2012, P703
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, P 21 INT C WORLD WID, DOI DOI 10.1145/2187836.2187907
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, RECSYS 11 P 5 ACM C, DOI DOI 10.1145/2043932.2043957
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW '08, DOI DOI 10.1145/1367497.1367586
[6]  
Antoniades D., 2015, Comput. Social Networks, V2, P1, DOI 10.1186/s40649-015-0023-6
[7]  
Baatarjav EA, 2008, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5333, P211
[8]   Analysis of user keyword similarity in online social networks [J].
Bhattacharyya, Prantik ;
Garg, Ankush ;
Wu, Shyhtsun Felix .
SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AND MINING, 2011, 1 (03) :143-158
[9]  
Bischoff K, 2012, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD ANNUAL ACM WEB SCIENCE CONFERENCE, 2012, P47
[10]   Recommender systems survey [J].
Bobadilla, J. ;
Ortega, F. ;
Hernando, A. ;
Gutierrez, A. .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2013, 46 :109-132