The impacts of reduced access to abortion and family planning services on abortions, births, and contraceptive purchases

被引:57
作者
Fischer, Stefanie [1 ]
Royer, Heather [2 ,3 ,4 ]
White, Corey [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] IZA Inst Labor Econ, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[4] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Family planning; Abortion; Birth; Contraception; Reproductive; Health; PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT LAWS; UNITED-STATES; FERTILITY; PILL; POWER; POLICIES; TEXAS; AVAILABILITY; PROGRAMS; FACILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.08.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Between 2011 and 2014, Texas enacted three pieces of legislation that significantly reduced funding for family planning services and increased restrictions on abortion clinic operations. Together this legislation creates cross-county variation over time in access to abortion and family planning services, which we leverage to understand the impact of family planning and abortion clinic access on abortions, births, and contraceptive purchases. In response to these policies, abortions to Texas residents fell 16.7% and births rose 1.3% in counties that no longer had an abortion provider within 50 mi. Changes in the family planning market induced a 1.2% increase in births for counties that no longer had a publicly funded family planning clinic within 25 mi. Meanwhile, responses of retail purchases of condoms and emergency contraceptives to both abortion and family planning service changes were minimal. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 68
页数:26
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Diamond, Alexis ;
Hainmueller, Jens .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 105 (490) :493-505
[2]   An analysis of out-of-wedlock childbearing in the United States [J].
Akerlof, GA ;
Yellen, JL ;
Katz, ML .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1996, 111 (02) :277-317
[3]   THE POWER OF THE PILL FOR THE NEXT GENERATION: ORAL CONTRACEPTION'S EFFECTS ON FERTILITY, ABORTION, AND MATERNAL AND CHILD CHARACTERISTICS [J].
Ananat, Elizabeth Oltmans ;
Hungerman, Daniel M. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2012, 94 (01) :37-51
[4]  
[Anonymous], TECHNICAL REPORT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Technical report
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, TRENDS LONG ACTING R
[7]   The impact of government policies and neighborhood characteristics on teenage sexual activity and contraceptive use [J].
Averett, SL ;
Rees, DI ;
Argys, LM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2002, 92 (11) :1773-1778
[8]  
Bailey MJ, 2013, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P341
[9]   Reexamining the Impact of Family Planning Programs on US Fertility: Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X [J].
Bailey, Martha J. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2012, 4 (02) :62-97
[10]   "Momma's Got the Pill": How Anthony Comstock and Griswold v. Connecticut Shaped US Childbearing [J].
Bailey, Martha J. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (01) :98-129