Comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter alone or in combination for termination of second trimester pregnancy

被引:16
作者
Rezk, Mohamed Abd-Allah [1 ]
Sanad, Zakaria [1 ]
Dawood, Ragab [1 ]
Emarh, Mohamed [1 ]
Masood, Alaa [1 ]
机构
[1] Menoufia Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Shibin Al Kawm, Menufia, Egypt
关键词
Foley catheter; misoprostol; pregnancy termination; second trimester; MEDICAL ABORTION; FETAL-DEATH; MIFEPRISTONE; TRIAL; INDUCTION;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2014.905909
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To examine the effectiveness, safety and acceptability of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter alone or in combination for termination of second trimester pregnancy. Methods: This clinical study was conducted on 90 pregnant patients intended for termination of pregnancy between 13 and 24 gestational weeks for any indication. Enrolled women are equally allocated into three groups: Group I (Misoprostol group): a standard regimen of moistened misoprostol (400 mg) 4 hourly inserted vaginally. Group II (Catheter group): intracervical Foley catheter inserted, inflated and placed on traction. Group III (Combined group): intracervical Foley catheter inserted with a standard regimen of moistened misoprostol (400 mg) 4 hourly intravaginally was used. Procedure efficacy (defined as complete abortion performed on site), safety and acceptability were assessed. Results: The induction to abortion interval was 7.5 +/- 1.25 h in the combined group, compared to 11.76 +/- 1.63 h in the misoprostol group and 19.76 +/- 1.52 h in the catheter group (p value < 0.001) with a success rate of 100% and no major complications reported. Conclusions: The present results confirmed the high success rate with the shortest induction to abortion interval with a combined use of intracervical Foley catheter and misoprostol for termination of second trimester pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 96
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Midtrimester medical termination of pregnancy: a review of 1002 consecutive cases [J].
Ashok, PW ;
Templeton, A ;
Wagaarachchi, PT ;
Flett, GMM .
CONTRACEPTION, 2004, 69 (01) :51-58
[2]   Nonsurgical mid-trimester termination of pregnancy: a review of 500 consecutive cases [J].
Ashok, PW ;
Templeton, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (07) :706-710
[3]   Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester [J].
Drey, EA ;
Foster, DG ;
Jackson, RA ;
Lee, SJ ;
Cardenas, LH ;
Darney, PD .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (01) :128-135
[4]   Second-trimester termination of pregnancy by extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2 α or endocervical misoprostol -: A comparative study [J].
Ghorab, MNM ;
El Helw, BA .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 77 (04) :429-432
[5]   A randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion at 13-20 weeks gestation [J].
Hamoda, H ;
Ashok, PW ;
Flett, GMM ;
Templeton, A .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (08) :2348-2354
[6]   Second trimester pregnancy termination: A comparison of 600 and 800 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol [J].
Herabutya, Y ;
Chanrachakul, B ;
Punyavachira, P .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2001, 27 (03) :125-128
[7]  
Herabutya Y, 1991, Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol, V17, P335
[8]   TERMINATION OF 2ND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY WITH SULPROSTONE AND MIFEPRISTONE - A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
HO, PC ;
MA, HK .
CONTRACEPTION, 1993, 47 (02) :123-129
[9]   Vaginal misoprostol compared with oral misoprostol in termination of second-trimester pregnancy [J].
Ho, PC ;
Ngai, SW ;
Liu, KL ;
Wong, GCY ;
Lee, SWH .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 90 (05) :735-738
[10]   A comparison of misoprostol with and without laminaria tents for induction of second-trimester abortion [J].
Jain, JK ;
Mishell, DR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) :173-177