Sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone precipitated withdrawal in subjects maintained on 100 mg of daily methadone

被引:74
作者
Rosado, James
Walsh, Sharon L.
Bigelow, George E.
Strain, Eric C.
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Behav Pharmacol Res Unit, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA
[2] Miami Dade Coll, Miami, FL 33132 USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Dept Behav Sci, Lexington, KY 40502 USA
关键词
buprenorphine; buprenorphine/naloxone; methadone; naloxone; opioid physical dependence; precipitated withdrawal;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.04.006
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale: Acute doses of buprenorphine can precipitate withdrawal in opioid dependent persons. The likelihood of this withdrawal increases as a function of the level of physical dependence. Objectives: To test the acute effects of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone tablets in volunteers with a higher level of physical dependence. The goal was to identify a dose that would precipitate withdrawal (Phase 1), then determine if withdrawal could be attenuated by splitting this dose (Phase 2). Methods: Residential laboratory study; subjects (N=16) maintained on 100 mg per day of methadone. Phase 1: randomized, double blind, triple dummy, within Subject study. Conditions were sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone (4/1, 8/2, 16/4, 32 mg/8 rug), intramuscular naloxone (0.2 mg), oral methadone (100 mg), or placebo. Medication conditions were randomized, but buprenorphine/naloxone doses were ascending within the randomization. Phase 2: Conditions were methadone, placebo, naloxone, 100% of the bulprenorphine/naloxone dose that precipitated withdrawal in Phase I (full dose), and 50% of this dose administered twice in a session (split dose). Analyses covaried by trough methadone serum levels. Results: Six subjects did not complete the study. Of the 10 who completed, 3 tolerated up to 32 mg/8 mg of buprenorphine/naloxone without evidence of precipitated withdrawal. For the seven completing both phases, split doses generally produced less precipitated withdrawal compared to full doses. Conclusions: There is considerable between subject variability insensitivity to buprenorphine's antagonist effects. Low, repeated doses of buprenorphine/naloxone (e.g., 2 mg/0.5 mg) may be an effective mechanism for safely dosing this medication in persons with higher levels of physical dependence. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 269
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, The treatment of opioid dependence
  • [2] Pharmacokinetics of the combination tablet of buprenorphine and naloxone
    Chiang, CN
    Hawks, RL
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2003, 70 : S39 - S47
  • [3] Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of multiple sublingual buprenorphine tablets in dose-escalation trials
    Ciraulo, DA
    Hitzemann, RJ
    Somoza, E
    Knapp, CM
    Rotrosen, J
    Sarid-Segal, O
    Ciraulo, AM
    Greenblatt, DJ
    Chiang, CN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 46 (02) : 179 - 192
  • [4] Clark NC, 2002, MED J AUSTRALIA, V176, P166
  • [5] Effects associated with double-blind omission of buprenorphine/naloxone over a 98-h period
    Correia, Christopher J.
    Walsh, Sharon L.
    Bigelow, George E.
    Strain, Eric C.
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 189 (03) : 297 - 306
  • [6] DOXEY JC, 1982, BR J PHARM, V75
  • [7] High interindividual variability of methadone enantiomer blood levels to dose ratios
    Eap, CB
    Bertschy, G
    Baumann, P
    Finkbeiner, T
    Gastpar, T
    Gastpar, M
    Scherbaum, N
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 55 (01) : 89 - 90
  • [8] Interindividual variability of the clinical pharmacokinetics of methadone - Implications for the treatment of opioid dependence
    Eap, CB
    Buclin, T
    Baumann, P
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2002, 41 (14) : 1153 - 1193
  • [9] FRASER HF, 1961, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V133, P371
  • [10] Pharmacokinetics and subjective effects of sublingual buprenorphine, alone or in combination with naloxone - Lack of dose proportionality
    Harris, DS
    Mendelson, JE
    Lin, ET
    Upton, RA
    Jones, RT
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2004, 43 (05) : 329 - 340