A Simplified Approach for Rainfall-runoff Modeling Using Advanced Soft-computing Methods

被引:0
作者
Kumar, Deepak [1 ]
Roshni, Thendiyath [2 ]
Singh, Anshuman [2 ]
Himayoun, Dar [1 ]
Samui, Pijush [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Patna, Dept Civil Engn, Patna 800005, Bihar, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol Patna, Civil Engn Dept, Patna 800005, Bihar, India
关键词
Rainfall-runoff; PCA; XGBoost; Emotional neural network; GMDH-type neural network; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; IMPROVING FORECASTING ACCURACY; WATER-RESOURCES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study investigates three modeling approaches based on Xtreme Boosting Machine (XGBoost), Genetic Algorithm-optimized Emotional Neural Network (GA-EmNN) and Group Method of Data Handling-Neural Network (GMDH-NN) for rainfall-runoff modeling. The redundancy capability of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was applied to solve the problems of input selection in these machine learning models. Hence, the objective of this study is to develop an efficient approach to pre-process the data structure and ensemble it with machine learning models that produce a higher predictive accuracy. The three XGBoost, GA-EmNN and GMDH-NN models are trained and validated for streamflow forecasting using monthly rainfall and monthly runoff data of the Jhelum basin, India. Statistical fitness indices, like correlation (r), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), relative Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency coefficient (r NSE), Percent Bias (PBias) and Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), were used for model performance assessment. The analysis of results revealed that GA-EmNN model was well capable (Training: R=0.999, RMSE = 345.48 cumec, Testing: R=0.997, RMSE = 428.35 cumec) of predicting the streamflow, followed by GMDH-NN and XGBoost. The results of this approach would benefit future modeling efforts, by underlining the application of these methods in hydrological modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 392
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Modelling rainfall-runoff using genetic programming [J].
Whigham, PA ;
Crapper, PF .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2001, 33 (6-7) :707-721
[22]   A systematic approach to the input determination for neural network rainfall-runoff models [J].
Lin, Gwo-Fong ;
Chen, Guo-Rong .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2008, 22 (14) :2524-2530
[23]   Comparative Case Study of Rainfall-Runoff Modeling between SWMM and Fuzzy Logic Approach [J].
Wang, Keh-Han ;
Altunkaynak, Abdusselam .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2012, 17 (02) :283-291
[24]   A stochastic approach for assessing the uncertainty of rainfall-runoff simulations [J].
Montanari, A ;
Brath, A .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2004, 40 (01) :W011061-W0110611
[25]   Analytical Model to Predict Protein Structure using Soft-Computing Approach [J].
Bordoloi, Hemashree ;
Nirmala, S. R. ;
Sarma, Kandarpa Kumar .
BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 14 (06) :324-327
[26]   The connection between time of concentration and rainfall intensity based on rainfall-runoff modeling [J].
Negyesi, Klaudia ;
Nagy, Eszter Dora .
IDOJARAS, 2024, 128 (04) :439-450
[27]   Application of the PSO-neural network in rainfall-runoff modeling [J].
Kumar, Keshav ;
Singh, Vivekanand ;
Roshni, Thendiyath .
WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01) :16-26
[28]   Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff extreme events [J].
Panagoulia, D. ;
Maratos, N. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL A, ORAL PRESENTATIONS, 2003, :682-689
[29]   Modeling of the daily rainfall-runoff relationship with artificial neural network [J].
Rajurkar, MP ;
Kothyari, UC ;
Chaube, UC .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 285 (1-4) :96-113
[30]   Rainfall-runoff modeling for the Hoshangabad Basin of Narmada River using artificial neural network [J].
Vikas Poonia ;
Hari Lal Tiwari .
Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2020, 13